Annotated Bibliography

Go to Table of Contents

Use the keyboard shortcut “CTRL+F” to search by word

Rationale

This bibliography aims to be useful to students and researchers alike. For this reason, it starts with a description of Peirce’s primary sources and their editions, listing them chronologically with the initials habitually used by Peirce scholars to refer to them, and then proceeds thematically, dividing the body of secondary literature according to their main topic. For example, the first division is between general studies, which comprises introductory studies and biographies, and particular studies, which includes topics like phenomenology, semiotics, and philosophy of science. The themes are listed alphabetically and you can use the Table of Contents below to navigate them. Originally, this bibliography listed only monographs, with the exception of a list of papers appeared on Italian journals. The present version (September 2020) is enriched with papers from a broader range of journals. Without pretence of exhaustiveness, we hope to capture the liveliness of contemporary pragmatist discussions and to better reflect the development of current research. Please feel free to suggest new entries by emailing our Editorial Team!

Table of Contents

Primary Sources

During his lifetime, Peirce published a tremendous amount of papers, reviews, scientific reports. His manuscript legacy is however even more striking: more than 100,000 draft sheets, of which 50,000 still waiting to appear in an edition. Most of this material is today preserved at the Houghton Library, Harvard. In this section, you can find the list of volumes containing a great part of Peirce’s edited production (i.e., edited during his lifetime) and a part of his unpublished writings.

All the editions listed below are an important source for Peirce scholars, for different reasons. Historical editions, like the Collected Papers o Chance, Love and Logic, were for a long time the main point of access to Peirce’s thought. Therefore, they are today especially interesting from the perspective of a history Peirce’s reception, or for retrieving passages which do not appear in more recent editions. (You can consult the manuscripts table to see if a manuscript has been published and where). A word of caution: the material constituting the Collected Papers is organised thematically rather than chronologically, which means that drafts from very different contexts and times are often merged.

The critical edition of Peirce’s works is the Writings of Charles S. Peirce: a Chronological Edition. At present (2020) the volumes 1-6, 8 have been published. They cover the period 1857-1892. Volume 2 of the reader The Essential Peirce contains essential writings of the period 1893-1913.

Recent editions, while they are not the critical edition, still aim at offering rigorous research tools to investigate Peirce’s thought with historical accuracy. Examples are Logic of the Future (edited by Pietarinen in 2019), which collects a great part of Peirce’s logic manuscripts, and Selected Writings on Semiotics 1894–1912, edited by Bellucci in 2020, which groups together manuscripts on semiotics from Peirce’s mature production. All editions of Peirce’s writings are listed below in chronological order, preceded by the initials usually found in the literature.

Back to Table of Contents

Peirce: manuscripts, editions, critical edition

MS:     The Charles S. Peirce Papers, 1787-1951, MS Am 1632, Houghton Library, Harvard University. The Houghton Library stores “more than100,000 working pages and drafts” (as reported on their website). For the great part, they are also preserved on microfilm. The Microfilm Edition of the Charles S. Peirce Papers in the Houghton Library of Harvard University (Cambridge: Widener Photographic Services, 1964; supplement 1971) consists of 38 reels (35 mm). It is also present on CD-rom at the Philosophy Library of the State University of Milan. Recently, the Houghton library  started a project of high-quality digitalization of the manuscirpt pages, starting from the 50,000 still unpublished pages. These resources are open access. The Humboldt University of Berlin also digitalised 50,000 pages of Peirce’s manuscripts, which can be viewed on their website. See Digital Resources and How to Quote for more tips on the manuscripts and on their editions!

PEIRCE, C. S. 1878. Photometric Researches. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. Ed. facsimile Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing’s Rare Reprints.

PEIRCE, C. S. (ed). 1883. Studies in Logic by Members of the Johns Hopkins University. Boston: Little & Brown. ed. 1983, Amsterdam: Benjamins; ed. facsimile, Elibron Classics, 2003.

CLL:   PEIRCE, C. S. [1923] 1998. Chance, Love and Logic. Philosophical Essays. Ed. Morris R.  COHEN. Lincoln, NE: Bison Books, University of Nebraska Press.

CP:      PEIRCE, C. S. 1931-1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1931, C. HARTSHORNE, P. WEISS (vols. 1-6) e A. W. BURKS (vols. 7-8) (eds), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [1931, v. 1: Principles Of Philosophy; 1932, v. 2: Elements Of Logic; 1933, v. 3: Exact Logic (Published Papers); 1933, v. 4: The Simplest Mathematics; 1934, v. 5: Pragmatism And Pragmaticism; 1935, v. 6: Scientific Metaphysics; 1958, v. 7: Science and Philosophy; 1958, v. 8: Reviews, Correspondence, and Bibliography]. Digital ed. 1994, edited by J. DEELY, Charlottesville.

PEIRCE, C. S. 1940. The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings, ed. by J. Buchler, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul;  1955, Philosophical Writings of Peirce, New York: Dover Publications.

PEIRCE, C. S. [1958] 1966. Values in a Universe of Chance: Selected Writings of C. S. Peirce, ed. by P.P. Wiener. New York: Dover Publications.

PEIRCE, C. S. 1972. Charles Sanders Peirce: the Essential Writings, ed. by E. Moore. New York: Harper & Row.

NEM: PEIRCE, C. S. 1976. The New Elements of Mathematics, vols. 1-4. Ed. Carolyn EISELE. La Hague: Mouton.

CN:     PEIRCE, C. S. 1975-1979. Charles Sanders Peirce: Contributions to The Nation. vols. 1-4, K. L. Ketner e J. E. Cook (eds). Lubbock: Texas Tech Press.

HP:      PEIRCE, C. S. 1985. Historical Perspectives on Peirce’s Logic of Science: A History of Science, vols. 1-2. Ed. Carolyn EISELE. Berlino: Mouton.

RLT:   PEIRCE, C. S. 1992. Reasoning and the Logic of Things. The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898. K. L. KETNER (ed).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

PPM:   PEIRCE, C. S. 1997. Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking. The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism. P. A. Turrisi (ed). New York: State University of New York Press.

EP:      PEIRCE, C. S. 1992-98. The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, v. 1: 1867-1893, ed. by Nathan HOUSER and Christian KLOESEL; v. 2: 1893-1913, ed. by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

LI:       PEIRCE, C. S. 2009. The Logic of Interdisciplinarity: The Monist-Series. Ed. Elize BISANZ. Berlin: Academie Verlag GmbH.

W:        PEIRCE, C. S. 1982-2010. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vols. 1-6, 8. 1982, v. 1: M. H. Fisch (ed.); 1984, v. 2: E. C. Moore (ed.); 1986, v. 3; 1989, v. 4; 1993, v. 5: C. J. W. Kloesel (ed.);  2000, v. 6; 2010, v. 8: Peirce Edition Project (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

PEIRCE, C. S. 2014. Illustrations of the Logic of Science. Ed. by C. De Waal. Chicago: Open Court.

PSR:    PEIRCE, C. S. 2016. Prolegomena to a Science of Reasoning: Phaneroscopy, Semeiotic, Logic. Ed. Elize BISANZ. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

LF1:      PEIRCE, C. S. 2019. Logic of the Future. Writings on Existential Graphs. v.1: History and Applications. Ed. Ahti-Veikko PIETARINEN. Berlin: De Gruyter.

LF2:    PEIRCE C. S. 2021. Logic of the Future. Writings on Existential Graphs. v. 2: The 1903 Lowell Lectures and Correspondences. Ed. Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen. Berlin: De Gruyter.

SWS:   PEIRCE, C. S. 2020. Selected Writings on Semiotics 1894–1912. F. Bellucci (ed.), Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Go to Table of Contents

Peirce: Correspondence

SS: HARDWICK, C. 1977. Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2ª edizione, 2001, Elsah, IL: The Press of Arisbe Associates.

LIEB, Irwin C. (ed). 1953. Charles S. Peirce’s Letters to Lady Welby. New Haven: Whitlock’s.

JOSIAH ROYCE / C. S. PEIRCE. Correspondence.

PEP: Peirce Edition Project, List of Correspondents.

WILLIAM JAMES / C. S. PEIRCE. 2011. Alle origini del pragmatismo. Corrispondenza tra C.S. Peirce e W. James. A cura di Giovanni Maddalena e Marco Annoni. Torino: Aragno.

Back to Table of Contents

Secondary Sources

The Italian School

It is possible to identify an “Italian School” of Peirce studies, which flourished around the following universities (listed in alphabetical order):  Alma Mater Studiorum di Bologna, Università Statale di Milano, Università del Molise, Università di Roma Tre. Below you find a list of books and papers which contributed to Peirce studies in Italy and beyond. Most of the following literature is in Italian.

Back to Table of Contents

Books

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2017. Peirce’s Speculative Grammar. Logic as Semiotics. London & New York: Routledge.

BENEDUCE, R. 1986. I modi del pensiero secondo Charles S. Peirce: dalla critica dell’introspezionismo alla fondazione logica della psicologia. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

BERALDI, Piero. 2005. Legge della ragione ed esperienza umana: Peirce, James, Dewey. Bari: Edizione dal Sud.

BONCOMPAGNI, Anna. 2016. Wittgenstein and Pragmatism: On Certainty in the Light of Peirce and James. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 

BONFANTINI, Massimo A. e MARTONE, A. 1993. Peirce in Italia. Atti del Convegno internazionale Peirce in Italia, organizzato dall’Istituto italiano per gli studi filosofici, dal Dipartimento di filosofia e politica dell’Istituto universitario orientale, e dal Centro napoletano di semiotica : Napoli, Palazzo Serra di Cassano, 5-7 dicembre 1990. Napoli: Liguori.

BONFANTINI, Massimo. 2004. L’abduzione in Peirce. Torino: Ananke.

BOSCO, Nynfa. 1959. La filosofia pragmatica di Ch. S. Peirce. Torino: Edizioni di Filosofia.

BOSCO, Nynfa. 1977. Studio sul pragmatismo di C.S. Peirce. Dalla scienza alla metafisica. Torino: Giappichelli.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2020. Creativity between Experience and Cosmos: C.S. Peirce and A.N. Whitehead on Novelty. Freiburg im Breisgau: Verlag Karl Alber.

CALCATERRA, Rosa. 1989. Interpretare l’Esperienza: Scienza, Metafisica, Etica nella Filosofia di C. S. Peirce. Roma: Ianua.

CALCATERRA, Rosa. 1997. Introduzione a il pragmatismo americano. Roma, Bari: Laterza.

CALCATERRA, Rosa. 2004. Forme di spazi di responsabilità: postille alla logica normativa di Peirce . Torino: Ananke.

CALCATERRA, Rosa (ed.). 2005. Semiotica e fenomenologia del sé. Torino: Nino Aragno Editore.

CELANO, Bruno et al. 1990. Filosofie per Intersezione: Saggi su Aristotele, Leibniz, Peirce, Bloch, Heidegger, Ricoeur. Palermo: L’Epos.

DANIEL, Marta. 2012. Pragmatismo e religione : gli scritti teologici di C. S. Peirce. Milano: Albo versorio.

DESSÌ, Paola. 1989. L’ordine e il caso: discussioni epistemologiche e logiche sulla probabilità da Laplace a Peirce. Bologna: Il Mulino.

ECO, Umberto. 1971. Le forme del contenuto. Milano: Bompiani.

ECO, Umberto. 1973. Il segno, Milano: Isedi.

ECO, Umberto. 1997. Kant e l’ornitorinco. Milano: Bompiani.

ECO, Umberto. 2007. La soglia e l’infinito. Peirce e l’iconismo primario. In Studi di semiotica interpretativa, a cura di C. Paolucci, ristampato in Dall’albero al labirinto. Milano: Bompiani.

FADDA, Emanuele. 2013. Peirce. Roma: Carocci.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1983. La polemica sull’iconismo (1964-1975), Napoli: ESI.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1986. Sulle Tracce del Segno. Firenze: Nuova Italia Editrice.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1992. Il concetto di relazione in Peirce: Dalla genesi categoriale alla notazione logico diagrammatica. Milano: Jaca Book.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1993. Introduzione a Peirce. Roma: Laterza.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 2001. Continuità e vaghezza: Leibniz, Goethe, Peirce, Wittgenstein. Milano: CUEM.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 2002. Cosa significa dirsi pragmatisti: Peirce e Wittgenstein a confronto. Milano: CUEM.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2014. Peirce e Wittgenstein: Un Incontro: Immagine, Prassi, Credenza. Milano; Udine: Mimesis.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella, Massimo A. BONFANTINI, & Salvatore ZINGALE.(eds.) 2015. Su Peirce: Interpretazioni, Ricerche, Prospettive. Milano: Bompiani.

FABBRICHESI, R. e LEONI, Federico 2005. Continuità e variazione: Leibniz, Goethe, Peirce, Wittgenstein, con un’incursione kantiana. Milano: Mimesis.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella, e MARIETTI, Susanna (eds.). 2006. Semiotics and Philosophy in Charles Sanders Peirce. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella e SINI, Carlo. 1993. Variazioni sul foglio mondo. Peirce, Wittgenstein, la scrittura, Como: Hestia.

FERRIANI, Maurizio. 1999. Logica e filosofia della logica: studi su Boole e Peirce. Bologna: Clueb.

FUMAGALLI, Armando. 1995. Il Reale nel Linguaggio. Indicalità e Realismo nella Semiotica di Peirce. Milano: Vita e Pensiero. 2 ed. 2000.

FUMAGALLI, Armando. 2004. Da Peirce a Benveniste: gli indicatori e la teoria dell’enunciazione. Torino: Ananke.

GIACONI, M. 1990. Interpretazione del pragmatismo di C. S. Peirce. Pisa: ETS.

GUCCIONE, Monroy A. 1959. Peirce ed il pragmatismo americano. Palermo: Palumbo.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2003. Istinto razionale: studi sulla semiotica dell’ultimo Peirce. Torino: Trauben.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2009. Metafisica per assurdo. Peirce e i problemi dell’epistemologia contemporanea. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2015. Peirce. Brescia: La scuola.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2015. The Philosophy of Gesture: Completing Pragmatists Incomplete Revolution. Montreal, Kington, London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

MADDALENA, Giovanni e TUZET, Giovanni 2004. Charles Peirce nel dibattito filosofico attuale. Torino: Ananke.

MADDALENA, Giovanni e TUZET, Giovanni (a cura di) 2004. Peirce: fenomeni, segni, realtà. Torino: Ananke.

MADDALENA, Giovanni e TUZET, Giovanni (eds.). 2007. I Pragmatisti italiani. Tra alleati e nemici. Milano: Albo Versorio.

MARCHETTI, Giancarlo (a c. di). 1999. Il Neopragmatismo. Con contributi di Richard Bernstein. Firenze: Nuova Italia.

MARCHETTI, Giancarlo, Giovanni MADDALENA, & Rosa M. CALCATERRA. 2015. Il Pragmatismo: Dalle Origini Agli Sviluppi Contemporanei. Roma: Carocci.

MARIETTI, Susanna. 2001. Icona e Diagramma: Il Segno Matematico in Charles Sanders Peirce. Milano: Led.

MARIETTI, Susanna (ed.). 2003. Pragmatismo e grafi esistenziali. Milano: Jaca Book.

NICOLACI, Giuseppe. 1990. Filosofie per intersezioni: Saggi su Aristotele, Leibniz, Peirce, Bloch, Heidegger, Ricoeur. Palermo: Epos.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2020. Cognitive Semiotics. Integrating Signs, Minds, Meaning and Cognition, Berlin and New York: Springer.

PRONI, Giampaolo. 1990. Introduzione a Peirce. Milano: Strumenti Bompiani.

PRONI, Giampaolo. 2017. La Semiotica Di Charles S. Peirce: Il Sistema e l’Evoluzione. Ariccia: Aracne.

RAMPI, R. 2005. L’ornitorinco: Umberto Eco, Peirce e la conoscenza congetturale. Milano: M&B.

RIVERSO, E. 1957. Metafisica e scientismo: con un’appendice sulla logica di Charles Sanders Peirce. Napoli: Istituto Editoriale del Mezzogiorno.

RIVETTI BARBO’, Francesca. 1964. L’Antinomia del Mentitore da Peirce a Tarski. Milano: Vita e Pensiero; Milano: Jaca Book. 1986.

SALANITRO, N. 1969. Peirce e i problemi dell’interpretazione, Roma: Silva.

SANTUCCI, Antonio. 1963. Il pragmatismo in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.

SINI, Carlo 1972. Il pragmatismo americano. Bari: Laterza.

SINI, Carlo 1974. L’etica e il problema delle scienze normative in Peirce. L’Aquila: Centro tecnico culturale ed assistenziale.

SINI, Carlo 1981. Passare il segno. Semiotica, cosmologia, tecnica. Milano: Il Saggiatore.  

SINI, Carlo 2007. Eracle al bivio: semiotica e filosofia. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. [Raccoglie i precedenti saggi: SINI, Carlo 1975. La semiotica di Peirce: anno accademico 1974-75. L’Aquila: Centro tecnico culturale ed assistenziale; e SINI, Carlo 1978. Semiotica e filosofia : segno e linguaggio in Peirce, Nietzsche, Heidegger e Foucault, Bologna: Il Mulino].

TUZET, Giovanni 2006. La prima inferenza: l’abduzione di C. S. Peirce fra scienza e diritto. Torino: Giappichelli.

VIMERCATI, Fulvia. 2005. La scrittura del pensiero: semiotica e fenomenologia nei grafi esistenziali di C. S. Peirce. Milano: Albo versorio.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2020. Peirce on the Uses of History, Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

Back to Table of Contents

Papers, Special Issues, Book Chapters

AMBROSIO, Chiara. 2016. Composite Photographs and the Quest for Generality: Themes from Peirce and Galton. Critical Inquiry42(3), 547–579.

AMBROSIO, Chiara, BERGMAN, Mats, GAVA, Gabriele. and LEGG, Catherine. (eds.). 2017. Peirce on Indexicality. Recherches Semiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry, 2 vols.

AMBROSIO, Chiara, CAMPBELL Chris. 2017. “The Chemistry of Relations: Peirce, Perspicuous Representations and Experiments with Diagrams.” In Atkins R., Hull K. (eds.), Peirce on perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2013. “Diagrammatic Reasoning. Some Notes on Charles S. Peirce and Friedrich A. Lange.” History and Philosophy of Logic 34(4), 293–305.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2015. “Logic, Psychology, and Apperception. C. S. Peirce and J. F. Herbart.” Journal of the History of Ideas 76(1), 69–91.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2015. “Neat, Swine, Sheep, and Deer. Mill and Peirce on Natural Kinds.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(5), 911–932.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2016. “Inferences from Signs. Peirce and the Recovery of the σημεῖον.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 52(2), 259­–284.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2018 “Analysis and Decomposition in Peirce.” Synthese,(June).

BELLUCCI, Francesco; Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko. 2016. “Existential Graphs as an Instrument of Logical Analysis.” Part I: Alpha. The Review of Symbolic Logic 9(2), 209–237.

BONFANTINI, Massimo A. & GRAZIA, Roberto. 1976. “Teoria della conoscenza e funzione dell’icona in Peirce.” Versus, 15, 1-15.

BONFANTINI, Massimo A. & FERRARESI, Mauro (a cura di). 1984. La ragione abduttiva. Il Protagora, 6.

BONFANTINI, Massimo A. & Christian J. W. KLOESEL (a cura di). 1988. Peirceana. Numero monografico di Versus, 49.

BONFANTINI, Massimo A. & Christian J. W. KLOESEL (a cura di). 1990. Peirceana Two. Numero monografico di Versus, 55-56. Lista dei contributi.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2014. Peirce’s “fundamental abduction”: how creativity entails cosmology. Cognitio-Estudos, 11: 2. Open access.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2015. Surprise, Event, and the Problem of Novelty: A Comparison Between C.S. Peirce and A.N. Whitehead, in Thinking with Whitehead and the American PragmatistsExperience and Reality, B.G. Henning, M.T. Myers, J.D. John (eds.), pp. 135-147. Lanham (MD): Lexington Books: Rowman and Littlefield.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2015. Peirce cent’anni dopo. Pragmatismo, semiotica e filosofia. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, LXX, 3: 647-50.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2015. Il concetto di realtà secondo Peirce: tra attesa e sorpresa. In Massimo A. Bonfantini, Rossella Fabbrichesi e Salvatore Zingale (a cura di), Su Peirce. Interpretazioni, ricerche, prospettive. Milano: Bompiani.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2016. Hints toward Cosmology: The Need for Cosmology in Peirce’s Philosophy, Scio: Revista de Filosofía, special issue on “Charles S. Peirce: Pensar la Naturaleza y la Ciencia”, 12, pp. 51-73.    

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2017. Between Continuity and Atomism: the Universe according to C.S. Peirce and A.N. Whitehead, in J. Dziadkowiec e L. Lamza (eds.), Beyond Whitehead: Recent Advances in Process Thought, pp. 131-143. Lanham (MD): Lexington Books: Rowman and Littlefield.   

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2019. Does Continuity allow for Emergence? An Emergentist Reading of Peirce’s evolutionary thought. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy XI, 2, pp. 1-24. 

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2003. Lo spazio normativo dei sentimenti nell’ottica di Peirce, in R. Egidi, M. Dell’Utri, M. De Caro (a cura di) Normatività, fatti e valori, Quodlibet: Roma, pp.135-142.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2003. Emozioni e sensazioni nella semiotica di Ch. S. Pierce, in R. M. Calcaterra, Pragmatismo: i valori dell’esperienza. Letture di Peirce, James, Mead, Carocci: Roma, pp. 17-42.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2006. Psicologia e normatività epistemica. Figure dell’esternalismo, in R. M. Calcaterra (a cura di), Le ragioni del conoscere e dell’agire. Scritti in onore di Rosaria Egidi, Franco Angeli, Milano 2006.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2010. “Logical Normativity and Individual Accountability: Remarks on Peirce’s Perspective,” Cognitio, 11: 1, 11-21.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2011. “Varieties of Synechism. Peirce and James on Mind-World Continuity,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 25:4, pp. 412-424.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2015. Epistemologia del sé. Note dall’esternalismo di Pierce, in M. Bonfantini, R. Fabbrichesi, S. Zingale (a cura di), Su Peirce. Interpretazioni, ricerche, prospettive, Milano: Bompiani.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2016. La materia pragmatica de la realidad. Wittgenstein, Peirce, James, in P. Rychter (ed.), Realismo y experiencia, Pre-Textos, Valencia 2016, pp. 53-72.

CARAVÀ, Marta. 2015. “La nozione di “mente estesa” tra scienze cognitive, semiotica e pragmatismo. Alcune riflessioni a partire dal tema del linguaggio,” Rivista Italiana Di Filosofia Del Linguaggio, 2015, Numero Speciale, pp. 139 – 151.

CARAVÀ, Marta. 2019. “The Threshold of Representations. Integrating Semiotics and the Cognitive Sciences,” Versus, 48, pp. 157 – 173.

CRISTALLI, Claudia. 2017. “Experimental Psychology and the Practice of Logic. Charles S. Peirce and the Charge of Psychologism, 1869-1885.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IX: 1.

DENUNZIO, F. 2002. “Deleuze, Peirce e le mille rifrazioni cinematografiche del simbolo.” In A. Cicalese e A. Landi (a cura di), Simboli, linguaggi e contesti. Roma: Carocci.

FABBRI, Paolo. 1997. “Come Deleuze ci fa segno. Da Hjelmslev a Peirce,” in S. Vaccaro (a c. di), Il secolo deleuziano, Mimesis, Milano, pp. 111-124

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2004. “Peirce and Wittgenstein on Common Sense,” Cognitio. Revista de Filosofia, 5: 2, 180-193.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2010. “The Body of the Community: Peirce, Royce, and Nietzsche.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 2/1: 1-10, open access.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2010. “Il significato del significato in Peirce e Wittgenstein,”in R. M. Calcaterra e G. Maddalena (a cura di), Itinerari pragmatisti, numero speciale di “Paradigmi”, XXVIII, pp. 29-43.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2011. “Effects of Truth: the Darwinian Revolution and its Impact on Pragmatism,”in R. Frega ed., Pragmatist Epistemologies, Lanham (MD), Lexington Books, 153-173.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2011. “Iconic Thought and Diagrammatical Scripture. Peirce and the Leibnizian Tradition,”in Joȃo Queiroz and Frederik Stjernfelt eds., Diagrammatical Reasoning and Peircean Logic Representations,  Special Issue of “Semiotica”, 186-1/4: 111-127.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2015. La coscienza? Le tesi inattuali di Peirce e James a confronto con la filosofia novecentesca. P. Leonardi e C. Paolucci(a cura di), Filosofia del linguaggio, semiotica e filosofia della mente. A partire da C.S.Peirce nei cento anni dalla morte, numero speciale Semiotica e Filosofia del Linguaggio, in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 152-163.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2016. “Peirce, Mead, and the Theory of Extended Mind,” in M. Bergman & J. Queiroz eds., The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. New Edition. [open access].

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2017. “Eco, Peirce, and Iconism. A Philosophical Inquiry,”in S. Beardsworth and R. E. Auxier eds., The Philosophy of Umberto Eco, “The Library of Living Philosophers”, Vol. XXXV, Chicago (Illinois): Open Court, pp. 305-324, with a Reply by U. Eco, pp. 325-329.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2017. “The Iconic Ground of Gestures: Peirce, Wittgenstein, and Foucault,” in K. Hull and R. Atkins eds., Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: from Icons to Logic, London & New York: Routledge, 54-60.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2019. “Spinoza, Emerson, and Peirce: Re-Thinking the Genealogy of Pragmatism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society”, 55: 2, 103-118.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2019. “From Gestures to Habits: A Link Between Semiotics and Pragmatism.”Tony Jappy ed., The Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Peircean Semiotics, London: Bloomsbury.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella & BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina (eds.). 2017. “Pragmatism. Some New Ways of Thinking for an Old Name,” Monographic Issue of Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, n. 3/2017.

FADDA, Emanuele. 2014. “Dalla parte di Cerbero: Peirce e la comunicazione,” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio: 33-34.

FADDA, Emanuele. 2012. “Nota sulla nozione di ‘sentimento’ in C. S. Peirce,” in I. Pozzoni (ed.), Pragmata. Per una ricostruzione storiografica dei pragmatismi. Morolo: IF Press, 41-55.

GAVA, Gabriele. 2011. Peirce’s ‘Prescision’ as a Transcendental Method. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 19(2), 231–253.

GAVA, Gabriele. 2014. “What is Wrong with Intuitions? An Assessment of a Peircean Criticism of Kant.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 50(3), 340-359. 

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2012. “Peirce’s incomplete synthetic turn.” The Review of Metaphysics, LXV: 3, 613-640.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2017. “Scientific and not Scientistic: the Rich Realism of Pragmatism.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, LXXII: 3, 401-414.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2018. “Gestures, Peirce, and the French philosophy of mathematics.” Lebenswelt, 13, 67-78.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2019. “Anti-Kantianism as a Necessary Characteristic of Pragmatism.” In K.P. Skowroński and S- Pihlström (eds.), Pragmatist Kant. Pragmaism, Kant, and Kantianism in the Twenty-first Century, Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, 43-59.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2017. “Semiotics, Schemata, Diagrams and Graphs: a New Form of Diagrammatic Kantism by Peirce,” in: Peirce on Perception and Reasoning. From Icons to Logic, New York and London: Routledge, 117-133.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2018. “Logic of Relatives and Semiotics in Peirce. From the “Subject-Predicate” Inferential Structure to the Synechistic Topology of Interpretation,” in: How To Make Our Signs Clear, Boston: Brill, 36 – 58.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio & BELLUCCI, Francesco (eds.), 2015. Peirceana Three. Peirce e l’iconismo / On Iconism, Versus, 120.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio & LEONARDI, Paolo (a c. di). 2015. Filosofia del linguaggio, semiotica e filosofia della mente. A partire da c. S. Peirce nei cento anni dalla morte. Numero speciale della Società Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio (accessibile online).

PETRILLI, Susan. 2004. “From Pragmatic Philosophy to Behavioral Semiotics: Charles W. Morris After Charles S. Peirce.” Semiotica 148, 277-.

PETRILLI, Susan. 2010. “Image and Primary Iconism: Peirce and Husserl.” Semiotica 181, 263-.

PETRILLI, Susan. 2015. “Sign, Meaning, and Understanding in Victoria Welby and Charles S. Peirce.” Signs and Society (Chicago, Ill.), 3(1), 71-102.

PONZIO, Augusto. 1997. “Semiotics Between Peirce and Bachtin.” Russian Literature XLI, 333-352.

PONZIO, Augusto. 2005. “Dialogic Gradation in the Logic of Interpretation: Deduction, Induction, Abduction.” Semiotica 153, 155-173.

PONZIO, Augusto. 2015. “Peirce e Bachtin.” In M.A. BONFANTINI, R. FABBRICHESI, S. ZINGALE (a cura di), Su Peirce. Interpretazioni, ricerche, prospettive. Milano: Bompiani, 201-211.

PONZIO, Julia. 2019. “Form and Non-Linear Continuity: The Development of the Idea of Cluster in Peirce’s Thought.” Semiotica 226, 153-168.

QUARANTA, M. 1990. Peirce in Italia nel decennio 1903-1913,” Rivista di Psicologia, 2: 85-95.

ROGGERONE, G. A., 1991. “Charles Sanders Peirce.” In Antimo Negri(a cura di), Novecento filosofico e scientifico: protagonisti. Milano: Marzorati, pp. 615-637.

SANTARELLI, Matteo. 2017. “Security as Completeness. A Peircean Semiotic Reading of the Psychology of Attachment.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IX: 1.

SINI, Carlo. 1978. Semiotica ed ermeneutica nel pensiero contemporaneo, Dispensa, Milano: Cortina. [disponibile online].

SINI, Carlo. 1979. Attualità del socialismo logico di Peirce, in «Cultura e scuola», n. 70: 129-139. [disponibile online].

SINI, Carlo. 1979. “Il problema del segno in Husserl e in Peirce,” in «Quaderni di Filosofia», n. 57: 543-558. [disponibile online].

SINI, Carlo. 1982. “Grafi esistenziali e categorie semiotiche in Peirce, in AA.VV.,” Logica matematica e psicanalisi. Peano, Vailati, Peirce, Milano: Spirali, III: 3, 124-132.

SINI, Carlo. 1983. “Abduzione e cosmologia in Peirce,” in Bonfantini M. A., Proni G., L’abduzione, numero monografico di «Versus», 34: 13-20.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2011. “Philosophy and the Second Person: Peirce, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Benveniste, and Personal Pronouns as Universals of Communication,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 47/4, 389-420.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2012. “Peirce and Iconology: Habitus, Embodiment, and the Analogy between Philosophy and Architecture,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 4/1, 6-31.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2016. “C. S. Peirce on Abduction and Embodiment,” in M. Jung, R. Mazdia (ed.), Pragmatism and Embodied Cognitive Science, Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2018. « Comment naît un symbole ? Une comparaison entre Charles S. Peirce et George H. Mead, » Pragmata: Revue d’études pragmatistes. 1, 60-91.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2019. “Articulate Reason and Its Elusive Background. Notes on Josiah Royce’s Late Reading of Peirce,” Pragmatism Today 10/2, 63-72.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2019. “From Vague Symbols to Contested Concepts: Peirce, W. B. Gallie, and History,” History and Theory 58/2, 233-251.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2020. “Habit, Contingency and Love. On Charles S. Peirce and Félix Ravaisson,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy.

Back to Table of Contents

Studies on Charles S. Peirce

Biographies

BRENT, Joseph. 1993. Charles S. Peirce: A Life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2ª edizione rivista, 1998.

DELEDALLE, Gerard. 1990. Charles S. Peirce, 1839-1914: An Intellectual Biography. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

KETNER, Kenneth L. 1998. His Glassy Essence: An Autobiography of Charles Sanders Peirce. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

WALTHER, Elisabeth. 1989. Charles Sanders Peirce. Leben und Werk. Baden-Baden: Agis-Verlag.

WEISS, Paul. 1934. “Charles Sanders Peirce”. In Dictionary of American Biography. D. Malone (ed). VII, 2: 398-403. New York: Scribner.

Back to Table of Contents

General Studies

ALMEDER, Robert. 1980. The Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce. Oxford: Blackwell.

ANDERSON, Douglas. 1995. Strands of System. The Philosophy of Charles Peirce. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

APEL, Karl-Otto. 1975. Der Denkweg von Charles S. Peirce. Eine Einführung in den amerikanischen Pragmatismus.

APEL, Karl-Otto. 1981. Charles S. Peirce. From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

ATKIN, Albert. Peirce. London: Routledge, 2010.

AYER, Alfred J. 1968. The Origins of Pragmatism: Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Peirce and William James. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.

BACON, Michael. 2012. Pragmatism: an Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

BELLUCCI, Francesco, PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko & STJERNFELT, Frederick. 2014. Peirce: 5 Questions. Copenhagen: Automatic Press.

BERNSTEIN, Richard J. 1965. Perspectives on Peirce: Critical Essays on Charles Sanders Peirce. New Haven: Yale University Press.

BERNSTEIN, Richard J. 2010. The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.

BONFANTINI, Massimo A., FABBRICHESI, Rossella & ZINGALE, Salvatore (a cura di). 2015. Su Peirce: interpretazioni, ricerche, prospettive. Milano: Bompiani.

BOSCO, Nynfa. 1959. La filosofia pragmatica di C. S. Peirce. Torino: Edizioni di Filosofia.

BRUNNING, Jacqueline & FOSTER, Paul (eds.). 1997. The Rule of Reason: The Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

CALCATERRA, Rosa. 1989. Interpretare l’Esperienza: Scienza, Metafisica, Etica nella Filosofia di Ch S. Peirce. Roma: Ianua.

CALCATERRA, Rosa 1997. Introduzione al pragmatismo americano. Roma, Bari: Laterza & Figli.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2006. “Charles S. Peirce,” in A Companion to Pragmatism. Edited by John R. Shook, Joseph Margolis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 13-29.

DELANEY, Cornelius F. 1993. Science, Knowledge, and Mind. A Study in the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 1993. Introduzione a Peirce, Roma-Bari: Laterza.

FADDA, Emanuele. 2013. Peirce. Roma: Carocci.

FEIBLEMAN, James K. 1946. An Introduction to Peirce’s Philosophy: Interpreted as a System. New York: Harper.

FISCH, Max H. 1986. Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism. K. L. Ketner y C. Kloesel eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

FISCH, Max, KLOESEL, Christian J. W., and HOUSER, Nathan, eds. 1982. Introduction. In Writings of Charles. S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, v. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

FREEMAN, E. (ed.). 1983. The Relevance of Charles Peirce. La Salle, Ill.: The Hegeler Institute.

GALLIE, W. B. 1955. Peirce and pragmatism. Hardmondsworth: Pelican Books.

GIACONI, M. 1990. Interpretazione del pragmatismo di C. S. Peirce. Pisa: ETS.    

GUCCIONE Monroy, A. 1959. Peirce ed il pragmatismo americano, Palermo: Palumbo.

HOOKWAY, Christopher J. 1985. Peirce. London: Routledge.

HOOKWAY, Christopher J. 1998. Peirce, Charles Sanders (1839–1914). In Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, London and New York: Routledge. Vol. vii;269–84.

LEGG, Catherine, and HOOKWAY, Christopher. 2021. “Pragmatism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Updated 6 April 2021.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2015. Peirce. Brescia: La scuola.

MADDALENA, Giovanni e TUZET, Giovanni 2004. Charles Peirce nel dibattito filosofico attuale. Torino: Ananke.

MENAND, Luis. 2001. The Metaphysical Club: a story of ideas in America. London: Flamingo.

MISAK, Cheryl (ed.). 2004. The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MURPHEY, Murray G. 1961 [1993]. The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

NAGL, Ludwig. 1992. Charles Sanders Peirce. Frankfurt: Campus.

NUBIOLA, Jaime. 2012. “New Developments Regarding Peirce’s Reception in the Hispanic World,” Inter-American Journal of Philosophy 3 (1), 86-94.

NUBIOLA, Jaime & ZALAMEA, Fernando. 2006. Peirce y el mundo hispánico. Lo que C. S. Peirce dijo sobre España y lo que el mundo hispánico ha dicho sobre Peirce, Pamplona, Eunsa.

PARKER, Kelly A. 1998. The Continuity of Peirce’s Thought. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

PRONI, Giampaolo. 1990. Introduzione a Peirce. Milano: Strumenti Bompiani.

SCHEFFLER, Israel. 1974. Four Pragmatists: A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead and Dewey. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

TIERCELIN, Claudine. 1993. C. S. Peirce et le pragmatisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

VERICAT, José. 1988. “Introducción,” in C. S. Peirce, El hombre, un signo: (El pragmatismo de Peirce), Barcelona, Crítica Editorial.

De WAAL, Cornelis. 2001. On Peirce. Indiana: Wadsorth.

De WAAL, Cornelis. 2013. Peirce: A Guide for the Perplexed. Bloomsbury Academic.

Back to Table of Contents

Peirce Themes (in alphabetic order)

Epistemology, Theory of Inquiry and Abduction

ALMEDER, R. 1975. “Fallibilism and the Ultimate Irreversible Opinion.Rethinking Peirce’s Fallibilism.” American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph 9:33–54.

ALMEDER, R. 1975. “The Epistemological Realism of Charles Peirce.Rethinking Peirce’s Fallibilism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 11:3–17

ANDERSON, Douglas R. 1986. “The Evolution of Peirce’s Concept of Abduction.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 22 (2), 145-164.

ANDERSON, Douglas R. 1987. Creativity and the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.

ATKINS, Richard Kenneth. “Royce’s The Problem of Christianity and Peirce’s Epistemology,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 41:2–3, 39–55.

AYIM, Maryann. 1982. Peirce’s View of the Role of Reason and Instinct in Scientific Inquiry. Meerut, India: Anu Prakashan.

BAKALIS, Nikolaos. 2011. Philosophical and Historical Dimensions of Peirce’s Self-Corrective Thesis: Is Scientific Method Self-Corrective? Saarbrücken: Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften.  

BALAT, Michel & DELEDALLE-RHODES, Janice. 1993. A la recherche d’une méthode: Charles S. Peirce. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.

BALTZER, Ulrich. 1994. Erkenntnis als Relationengeflecht, Kategorien bei Peirce. Padderborn: Schönin.

BARRENA, Sara (ed.), 2008. Charles Sanders Peirce. Los universos creativos de la razón.   [Charles Sanders Peirce: The Creative Universes of Reason.] Utopia y Praxis Latinamericana v. 13(40). Available at Grupo de Estudios Peirceanos: Números Monográficos sobre C. S. Peirce en Español.

BARRENA, Sara. 2013. “Reason and Imagination in Charles S. Peirce.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 5: 1.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2015. “Logic, Psychology, and Apperception. C. S. Peirce and J. F. Herbart.” Journal of the History of Ideas 76(1), 69–91.

BERGMAN, Mats. 2007. “Representationism and Presentationism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society43(1), 53–89.

BERGMAN, Michael K. 2018. A Knowledge Representation Practionary. Guidelines Based on Charles Sanders Peirce. Dordrecht: Springer.

BERTILSSON, T. M. 2009. Peirce’s Theory of Inquiry and Beyond: Towards a Social Reconstruction of Science Theory. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2020. Creativity between Experience and Cosmos: C.S. Peirce and A.N. Whitehead on Novelty. Freiburg im Breisgau: Verlag Karl Alber.

BONFANTINI, Massimo A. 2004. L’abduzione in Peirce. Torino: Ananke.

BOULTING, Noel E. 2006. On Interpretative Activity: A Peircian Approach to the Interpretation of Science, Technology and the Arts. Leiden: Brill.

BUCHLER, Justus. 1939. Charles S. Peirce’s Empiricism. New York: Harcourt.

BURKS, Arthur. 1946. “Peirce’s Theory of Abduction.” Philosophy of Science 13.

CAMPOS, Daniel. 2011. “On the Distinction between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation.” Synthese 180:3, 419–442.

CHAUVIRÉ Christiane. 1981. La maxime pragmatiste et sa lecture vérificationniste, Fundamenta Scientiae, 5, 314.

CHAUVIRÉ, Christiane (a cura di). 1994. Actualité de Peirce. Numero monografico di Histoire, Épistémologie, Langage, 16: i.

CHEVALIER, Jean-Marie. 2013. “Peirce’s First Critique of the First Critique: A Leibnizian False Start.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 49(1), 1–26.

CHEVALIER, Jean-Marie. 2016. Qu’est-ce que raisonner? Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.

CHRISTENSEN, C. B. 1994. “Peirce’s Transformation of Kant.” The Review of Metaphysics 48:91–120.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2009. “Habit, competence, and purpose: how to make the grades of clarity clearer,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 45 (3), pp. 348-377.

COOKE, Elizabeth F. 2006. Peirce’s Pragmatic Theory of Inquiry: Falibilism and Indeterminacy. Londra: Continuum.

COOKE, Elizabeth F. 2011. “Phenomenology of Error and Surprise: Peirce, Davidson, and McDowell.” Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 47(1):62-86.

CROCKER, T. P. 1998. “Wittgenstein’s Practices and Peirce’s Habits: Agreement in Human Activity.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15:475–93.

DAVIS, William Hatcher. 1972. Peirce’s Epistemology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

DEBROCK, Guy e HULSWIT, Menno (eds). 1994. Living Doubt. Essays Concerning the Epistemology of Charles Sanders Peirce. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

DELANEY, Cornelius F. 1993. Science, Knowledge, and Mind. A Study in the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Notre Dame: University ofNotre Dame Press.

DELLEDALLE Gérard. 1981. “English and French versions of C. S. Perice’s The Fixation of Belief,” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society, XVII, 2, 141-152.

DESSÌ, P. 1989. L’ordine e il caso: discussioni epistemologiche e logiche sulla probabilità da Laplace a Peirce. Bologna: Il Mulino.

De TIENNE, André. 1996. L’analytique de la représentation chez Peirce. Bruxelles: Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis.

ENGEL-TIERCELIN, Claudine. 1989. “Reid and Peirce on Belief,” in The Philosophy of Thomas Reid, M. Dalgarno & E. Matthews eds., Kluwer Academic Publisher, 209-223.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2004. “Peirce and Wittgenstein on Common Sense,” Cognitio. Revista de Filosofia, 5: 2, 180-193.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2016. “Peirce, Mead, and the Theory of Extended Mind,” in M. Bergman & J. Queiroz eds., The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. New Edition.

FANN, K. T. 1970. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

GAVA, Gabriele. 2011. “Peirce’s ‘Prescision’ as a Transcendental Method.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 19(2), 231–253.

GAVA, Gabriele. 2014. “What is Wrong with Intuitions? An Assessment of a Peircean Criticism of Kant.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 50(3), 340-359. 

GAVA, Gabriele. 2014. Peirce’s Account of Purposefulness: a Kantian Perspective. New York: Routledge.

GENTRY, G. 1952. “Habit and the Logical Interpretant.” In Wiener and Young (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 75–92.

GOUDGE, Thomas A. 1940. Peirce’s Treatment Of Induction. Philosophy of Science, 7, 56-68.

GOUDGE, Thomas A. 1981. “Peirce and Rescher on Scientific Progress and Economy Of Research.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 20, 357-365.

GIREL, Mathias. 2003. “The metaphysics and logic of psychology: Peirce’s reading of James’s principles.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society39(2), 163–203.

HAACK, Susan. 1976. “The Pragmatist Theory of Truth.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27:231–49.

HINGST, Kai-Michael. 2000. “James’ Transformation der Pragmatischen Maxime von Peirce.” In William James, Pragmatismus, edited by K. Oehler, 33–68. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

HOOKWAY, Christopher. 2000. Truth, Rationality and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Clarendon Press.     

HUMPHREYS, J. 2019. “Subconscious inference in Peirce’s epistemology of perception.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society55(3), 326–346.

KASSER, Jeff. 1999. “Peirce’s Supposed Psychologism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society35(3), 501–526.

KASSER, Jeff. 2019. Normativity and Naturalism in “The Fixation of Belief.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 55(1), 1–19.

KEVELSON, Roberta. 1987. Charles S. Peirce’s Method of Methods. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

KEVELSON, Roberta. 1996. Peirce, Science, Signs. New York: Lang.

KHACHAB, Chihab El. 2013. The Logical Goodness of Abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 49:2, 157–177.

KOSHUL, Basit B. 2014. Max Weber and Charles S. Peirce: At the Crossroads of Science, Philosophy, and Culture. Lanham: Lexington Books.

KUHN, Friedrich. 1996. Ein anderes Bild des Pragmatismus. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Begründung der Induktion als massgebliche Einflussgrössen in den Illustrations of the Logic of Science von Charles Sanders Peirce. Frankfurt: Klostermann.       

LEGG, Catherine. 2014. “‘Things Unreasonably Compulsory’: A Peircean Challenge to a Humean Theory of Perception, Particularly with Respect to Perceiving Necessary Truths.” Cognitio 15:1, 89–112.

LEGG, Catherine, and Joshua BLACK. 2020. “What is intelligence for? A Peircean pragmatist response to the knowing-how, knowing-that debate.” Erkenntnis, published online.

LENZ, J. 1964. “Induction as Self-Corrective.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. 2nd series, edited by E. C. Moore and R. Robin,151–62. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

LEVI, Isaac. 1983. The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

LEVI, Isaac. 1991. The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LEVI, Isaac. 2012. Pragmatism and Inquiry: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2012. “Peirce’s incomplete synthetic turn.” The Review of Metaphysics, LXV: 3, 613-640.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2015. The Philosophy of Gesture: Completing Pragmatists Incomplete Revolution. Montreal, Kington, London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2017. “Scientific and not Scientistic: the Rich Realism of Pragmatism.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, LXXII: 3, 401-414.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2019. “Anti-Kantianism as a Necessary Characteristic of Pragmatism.” In K.P. Skowroński and S- Pihlström (eds.), Pragmatist Kant. Pragmaism, Kant, and Kantianism in the Twenty-first Century, Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, 43-59.

MARGOLIS. Joseph. 2007. “Rethinking Peirce’s Fallibilism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43(2), 229-249

MAYO, Deborah. G. (2005). Peircean Induction and the Error-Correcting Thesis Error-Correcting Thesis. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41(2), 299–319. 

McKAUGHAN, Daniel. 2008. “From Ugly Duckling to Swan: C. S. Peirce, Abduction, and the Pursuit of Scientific Theories.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 44:3, 446–468.

MIGOTTI, Mark. 2005. “The Key to Peirce’s View of the Role of Belief in Scientific Inquiry.” Cognitio. 6:1, 44–55.

MISAK, Cheryl J. 1991. Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean account of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

MISAK, Cheryl J. 1995. Verificationism: Its History and Prospects. London: Routledge.

MLADENOV, Ivan.   2005. Conceptualizing Metaphors: On Charles Peirce’s Marginalia. New York: Routledge.

MOORE, Matthew E. 2007. “The Genesis of the Peircean Continuum.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43(3), 425–469.

MULLER, Ralph. 1999. Die Dynamische Logik des Erkennens von Charles S. Peirce. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.

PAAVOLA, Sami. 2005. “Peircean Abduction: Instinct or Inference?” Semiotica. 153:1/4, 131–154.

PAAVOLA, Sami. 2006. On the Origin of Ideas: An Abductivist Approach to Discovery, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

PAPE, Helmut. 1994. Kreativität und Logik: Charles S. Peirce und das philosophische Problem des Neuen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko, and Francesco BELLUCCI. 2015. “New Light on Peirce’s Conceptions of Retroduction, Deduction, and Scientific Reasoning.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28:4, 353–373.

QUEIROZ, Joâo, LOULA, Angelo y GUDWIN, Ricardo (eds.). 2007. Computaçâo. Cogniçâo. Semiose. Bahia: Universidade Federal da Bahia.

RAMPI, R. 2005. L’ornitorinco: Umberto Eco, Peirce e la conoscenza congetturale. Milano: M&B.

REILLY, Francis E. 1970. Charles Peirce’s Theory of Scientific Method. New York: Fordham University Press.

RESCHER, Nicholas. 1978. Peirce’s Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

RIEMER, Ines. 1988. Konzeption und Begründung der Induktion: eine Untersuchung zur Methodologie von Charles S. Peirce. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

RICHTER, Ansgar. 1995. Der Begriff der Abduktion bei Charles Sanders Peirce. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

ROSENTHAL, Sandra B. 1969. “Peirce’s Theory of the Perceptual Judgment: An Ambiguity.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7:303–14.

SAVAN, David. 1965. “Decision and Knowledge in Peirce.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 1:38–49.

SCHEIBMAYR, Werner. 2004. Niklas Luhmanns Systemtheorie und Charles S. Peirces Zeichentheorie: zur Konstruktion eines Zeichensystems. Tubinga: Niemeyer.

SHERIFF, John K. 1994. Charles Peirce’s Guess at the Riddle. Grounds for Human Significance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

SHORT, Thomas L. 2015. “Empiricism Expanded.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 51(1), 1–33

SINI, Carlo. 1983. “Abduzione e cosmologia in Peirce,” in Bonfantini M. A., Proni G., L’abduzione, numero monografico di «Versus», 34: 13-20.

SKAGESTAD, Peter. 1981. The Road of Inquiry. Peirce’s Pragmatic Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.

SMYTH, Richard. 1985. Peirce’s Examination of Mill’s Philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 21(2), 157–199.

SORRELL, Kory S.   2004    Representative Practices: Peirce, Pragmatism, and Feminist Epistemology. New York: Fordham University Press.

TIERCELIN, Claudine. 1997. »Peirce on Norms, Evolution and Knowledge.« Trans- actions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 33 (1): 35–58.

TIERCELIN, Claudine. 2014. The Pragmatists and the Human Logic of Truth. Paris: Collège de France.

TURRISI, P. A. 1997a. Introduction to Pragmatism as a Principle and as a Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism,by C. S. Peirce, edited by P. A. Turrisi, 1–20. Albany: SUNY Press.

TURRISI, P. A. 1997b. Commentary on Pragmatism as a Principle and as a Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism,by C. S. Peirce, edited by P. A. Turrisi, 21–105. Albany: SUNY Press.

TURSMAN, Richard. 1987.  Peirce’s Theory of Scientific Discovery. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

TUZET, Giovanni 2006. La prima inferenza: l’abduzione di C. S. Peirce fra scienza e diritto. Torino: Giappichelli.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2016. “C. S. Peirce on Abduction and Embodiment,” in M. Jung, R. Mazdia (ed.), Pragmatism and Embodied Cognitive Science, Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2020. Peirce on the Uses of History, Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

De WAAL, Cornelis. 2015. “Peirce and Husserl on Making Science and Philosophy Rigorous.” Journal Phänomenologie 44, 73–88.

WARTENBERG, Gerd. 1971. Logischer Sozialismus: die Transformation der Kantschen Transzendentalphilosophie durch Ch. S. Peirce. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.

WEST, Donna E. & ANDERSON, M&rdene. 2016. Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit. New York: Springer.

WIGGINS, D. 1999. “C. S. Peirce: Belief, Truth, and Going from the Known to the Unknown.” In Pragmatism, edited by C. Misak. Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supp. Vol. 24:9–29.

WILSON, Aaron B. 2018. “Peirce’s Hypothesis of the Final Opinion.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], 10:2.

Back to Table of Contents

Ethics and Esthetics

ATKINS, Richard K. 2016.   Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.       

BARRENA, Sara. 2012.”La educación como crecimiento: el pragmatismo en las aulas”, V Jornadas GEP Argentina, 23-24 agosto.

BARRENA, Sara. 2010. “Charles S. Peirce, William James y Henry James: conexiones biográficas y estéticas”, International Conference on William James and Pragmatism, Coimbra, 12 y 13 de noviembre.

BARRENA, Sara. 2008. “Charles S. Peirce: Razón creativa y educación”, Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 40 (2008), 11-38.

BARRENA, Sara & NUBIOLA, Jaime. 2010. “Charles Peirce en Europa, 1870-71: experiencia artística y estética”, IV Jornadas GEP Argentina, 26-27 agosto.

BOYD, Kenneth & HENEY, Diana. 2017. “Peirce on Intuition, Instinct, & Common Sense,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IX-2.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2003. “Lo spazio normativo dei sentimenti nell’ottica di Peirce,” in R. Egidi, M. Dell’Utri, M. De Caro (a cura di) Normatività, fatti e valori, Quodlibet: Roma, pp.135-142.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2003. “Emozioni e sensazioni nella semiotica di Ch. S. Pierce,” in R. M. Calcaterra, Pragmatismo: i valori dell’esperienza. Letture di Peirce, James, Mead, Carocci: Roma, pp. 17-42.    

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2004. Forme di spazi di responsabilità: postille alla logica normativa di Peirce. Torino: Ananke.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2010. “Logical Normativity and Individual Accountability: Remarks on Peirce’s Perspective,” Cognitio, 11: 1, 11-21.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2015. “Epistemologia del sé. Note dall’esternalismo di Pierce,” in M. Bonfantini, R. Fabbrichesi, S. Zingale (a cura di), Su Peirce. Interpretazioni, ricerche, prospettive, Milano: Bompiani.

DIELEMAN, Susan, RONDEL, David & VOPARIL, Christopher. 2017. Pragmatism and Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

GUARDIANO, Nicholas. 2016. Aesthetic Trascendentalism in Emerson, Peirce, and Nineteenth-century American Painting. Lanham: Lexington.

HELDKE, Lisa M., and KELLERT, Stephen H. 1995. “Objectivity as responsibility.” Metaphilosophy 26, 360–78.

HERDY, Rachel. 2014. “The Origin and Growth of Peirce’s Ethics,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, VI-2.

IBRI, Ivo A. 2013. “The Heuristic Power of Agapism in Peirce’s Philosophy.”  Nóema, 4(2).

IBRI, Ivo A. 2016. “Linking the Aesthetic and the Normative in Peirce’s Pragmaticism: A Heuristic Sketch.” Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 52(4):598-610.

INNIS, Robert E. 2002. Pragmatism and the forms of sense : language, perception, technics. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.

INNIS, Robert E. 2019. “Peirce and Dewey think about art: Quality and the theory of signs,” Semiotica2019(228), 103-133.

KEVELSON, Roberta. 1991. Peirce and Law: Issues in Pragmatism, Legal Realism and Semiotic. New York: Lang.

KEVELSON, Roberta. 1993. Peirce’s Esthetics of Freedom: Possibility, Complexity, and Emergent Value. New York: Lang.

LaFOLLETTE, Hugh. 2000. Pragmatic Ethics, in H. LaFollette (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, Malden (MA): Blackwell, 400-419.

LEGG Catherine & STRAND, Torill. “Peirce and Education—an Overview” in Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory.

LIVINGSTON, James. 2001. Pragmatism, Feminism, and Democracy: Rethinking the Politics of American History. London and New York: Routledge.

LISZKA, James Jacób. 2012. “Charles Peirce on Ethics.” In The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce, Fordham University Press.

LISZKA, James Jacób. 2014. “Peirce’s Idea of Ethics as a Normative Science. Charles S. Peirce Society Presidential Address.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 50(4): 459-479.

LISZKA, James Jakób. 2021. Charles Peirce on Ethics, Esthetics and the Normative Sciences. Routledge.

MAGADA-WARD, Mary. 2019. “What is the American Sublime? Ruminations on Peircian Phenomenology and the Paintings of Barnett Newman.”Contemporary Pragmatism 16(1):30-39.

MASSECAR, Aaron. 2013. “The Fitness of an Ideal: A Peircean Ethics.” Contemporary Pragmatism 10: 97-119.

MASSECAR, Aaron. 2014. “Peirce, Moral Cognitivism, and the Development of Character.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy. 50 (1): 139-161.

MASSECAR, Aaron. 2016.   Ethical Habits: A Peircean Perspective. Lanham: Lexington.

MISAK, Cheryl J. 1999. Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. London: Routledge.

MULLIN, Richard P. 2007.   The Soul of Classical American Philosophy: The Ethical and Spiritual Insights of William James, Josiah Royce, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Albany: State University of New York Press.

OOSTRA Arnold, ZALAMEA Fernando. 2014. “On Peirce’s Estethics.” Cuadernos de Sistematica Peirceana, 6.

PAPE, Helmut. 2012. “Self-Control, Values, and Moral Development: Peirce on the Value-driven Dynamics of Human Morality.” The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. Eds. Cornelis de Waal and Krzysztof Piotr Skowronski. New York: Fordham University Press.

PARRET, Herman (ed.). 1994. Peirce and value theory: On Peircean ethics and aesthetics. John Benjamins Publishing.

PIHLSTRÖM, Sami. 2005. Pragmatic Moral Realism: A Trascendental Defense. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

POTTER, Vincent G. 1967. Charles S. Peirce: On Norms and Ideals. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. New York: Fordham University Press, 1997.

SEIGFREID, Charlene Haddock. 1989. “Pragmatism, feminism, and sensitivity to context.” In Who Cares? Theory, Research, and Educational Implications of the Ethic of Care, ed. Mary M. Brabeck (New York: Praeger), pp. 63–83.

SEIGFREID, Charlene Haddock. 1996. Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

SERRA, Juan Pablo. 2010. “What Is and What Should Pragmatic Ethics Be?,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, II-2.

SMITH, C. M. 1972. “The Esthetics of Charles S. Peirce.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 31:1, 21–29.

SOBRINHO, Blasco José. 2001. Signs, Solidarities, and Sociology: Charles S. Peirce and the Pragmatics of Globalization. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.  

STRAND T., LEGG C.W. 2019. Peirce and Education, an Overview. In: Peters M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Living Edition. Springer, Singapore.

SULLIVAN, Shannon. 2001. Living Across and Through Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism and Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

TALISSE, Robert. 2007. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy: Communities of Inquiry. New York: Routledge.                    

TROUT, Lara. 2010.  The Politics of Survival: Peirce, Affectivity and Social Criticism. New York: Fordham University Press.        

De WAAL, Cornelis, and Krzysztof Piotr SKOWROŃSKI, eds. 2012. The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. New York: Fordham University Press

Back to Table of Contents

Logic, Mathematics, and Existential Graphs

ALISEDA, Atocha. 1997. Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2013. “Diagrammatic Reasoning. Some Notes on Charles S. Peirce and Friedrich A. Lange.” History and Philosophy of Logic 34(4), 293–305.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2015. “Neat, Swine, Sheep, and Deer. Mill and Peirce on Natural Kinds.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(5), 911–932.

BELLUCCI, Francesco; PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. 2016. “Existential Graphs as an Instrument of Logical Analysis.” Part I: Alpha. The Review of Symbolic Logic 9(2), 209–237.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2017. Peirce’s Speculative Grammar. Logic as Semiotics. London & New York: Routledge.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2018. “Analysis and Decomposition in Peirce.” Synthese,(June).

BELLUCCI, Francesco (ed.). 2020. Charles S. Peirce. Selected Writings on Semiotics 1894–1912. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

BENEDUCE, R. 1986. I modi del pensiero secondo Charles S. Peirce: dalla critica dell’introspezionismo alla fondazione logica della psicologia. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

BONFANTINI, Massimo. 2004. L’abduzione in Peirce. Torino: Ananke.

BOERSEMA, David. 2009. Pragmatism and Reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

BRADY, Geraldine. 2000. From Peirce to Skolem: a Neglected Chapter in the History of Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.

BRAKEL, Jaap van & HEERDEN, Michael van (eds.). 1998. C. S. Peirce Categories to Constantinople. Lovaina: Leuven University Press.

BROCK, Jarrett E. 2005. C. S. Peirce Logic of Vagueness. Ann Harbor: University of Illinois.

BURCH, Robert W.   1991. A Peircean Reduction Thesis: The Foundations of Topological Logic. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.

BUZZETTI D. and M. Ferriani (eds). 1987. Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar and Philosophical Analysis of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

CAMPOS, Daniel G. 2007. “Peirce on the Role of Poietic Creation in Mathematical Reasoning”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43: 3, 470-489.

CHAUVIRÉ, Christiane. 1995. Peirce et la signification: Introduction à la loqique du vague. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

CHAUVIRÉ, Christiane. 2008. L’oeil mathématique: Essai sur la philosophie mathématique de Peirce. Paris: Kimé.

CHENG, Chung-Ying. 1969. Peirce’s and Lewis’s Theories of Induction. La Haya: Martinus Nijhoff.

DAUBEN, J. W. 1982. “Peirce’s Place in Mathematics.” Historia Mathematica 9:311–25.

DIPERT, R. 1984. “Peirce, Frege, Church’s Theorem and the Logic of Relations.” History and Philosophy of Logic 5:49–66.

DIPERT, R. 1989. “Peirce’s Underestimated Place in the History of Logic: A Response to Quine.” In Peirce and Contemporary Thought, edited by K. L. Ketner, 32–58. New York: Fordham University Press.

DIPERT, R. 1997a. “The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as Graph.” Journal of Philosophy 94:329–58.

DIPERT, R. 1997b. “Peirce’s Philosophical Conception of Sets.” In N. Houser, D. D. Roberts,and J. Van Evra(eds.), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 53–76.

EISELE, Carolyn. 1979. Studies in the Scientific and Mathematical Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. La Haya: Mouton.

ENGEL, P. 1984. «Croyances, dispositions et probabilités : Peirce et Ramsy», Revue Philosophique 4, 402-426.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2011. Iconic Thought and Diagrammatical Scripture. Peirce and the Leibnizian Tradition, in Joȃo Queiroz and Frederik Stjernfelt eds., Diagrammatical Reasoning and Peircean Logic Representations,  Special Issue of “Semiotica”, 186-1/4: 111-127.

FADDA, Emanuele. 2014. “Dalla parte di Cerbero: Peirce e la comunicazione,” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio: 33-34.

FERRIANI, Maurizio. 1999. Logica e filosofia della logica: studi su Boole e Peirce. Bologna: Clueb.

GABBAY Dov, MAGNANI Lorenzo, PARK Woosuk, and PIETARINEN Ahti-Veikko, eds.  2019. Natural Arguments: A Tribute for John Woods. College Park Publications.

HAVENEL, Jérôme. 2008. “Peirce’s clarifications of continuity.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society44(1), 86–133.

HILPINEN, Risto. 2000. Aristotelian syllogistic as a foundation of C.S. Peirce’s theory of reasoning. New York: Lang.

HINTIKKA, Jaakko. 1988. “On the Development of the Model-Theoretic Viewpoint in Logical Theory.” Synthese 77:1–36.

HINTIKKA, Jaakko. 1997. “The Place of C. S. Peirce in the History of Logical Theory.” In J. Brunning and P. Forster (eds.), The Rule of Reason. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press, 13–33.

HOUSER, Nathan, ROBERTS, Don D. & VAN EVRA, James. 1997. Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

JOSEPHSON, John R. & JOSEPHSON, Susan G. 1994. Abductive Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.

KENT, Beverley E. 1987. Charles S. Peirce: Logic and the Classification of the Sciences. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

KETNER, Kenneth. L. 1988. “Peirce and Turing: Comparisons and Conjectures.” Semiotica 68 (1–2):33–61.

KETNER, Kenneth L. 1996. Elements of logic: An Introduction to Peirce’s Existential Graphs. Lubbock, TX: Arisbe Associates.

KLOESEL, C. 1981. “Speculative Grammar: From Duns Scotus to Charles Peirce.” In K. Ketner (ed.), Proceedings of the C. S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press, 127–34.

LANE, Robert. 2007. “From Set Theory to Pragmaticism: Peirce’s Modal Shift.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45:4, 551–576.

LEE, Buckley, Benjamin. 2012. The Continuity Debate: Dedekind, Cantor, du Bois-Reymond and Peirce on Continuity and Infinitesimals. Boston: Docent Press.

LIPTON, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. Londres: Routledge.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2018. “Gestures, Peirce, and the French philosophy of mathematics.” Lebenswelt, 13, 67-78.

MARIETTI, Susanna. 2001.  Icona e Diagrama: Il Segno Matematico in Charles Sanders Peirce. Milano Led.

MARIETTI, Susanna (ed.). 2003. Pragmatismo e grafi esistenziali. Milano: Jaca Book.

MARTIN, R. M. 1980. Peirce’s Logic of Relations and Other Studies. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

MICHAEL, E. 1976. “Peirce’s Earliest Contact with Scholastic Logic.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12:46–55.

MICHAEL, E. 1977. “A Note on the Roots of Peirce’s Division of Logic into Three Branches.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18:639–40.

MICHAEL, E., and MICHAEL, F. 1979. “Peirce on the Nature of Logic.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20:84–8.

MICHAEL, F. 1980. The Deduction of the Categories in Peirce’s “New List.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 16:179–211.

MICHAEL, F. 1988. “Two Forms of Scholastic Realism in Peirce.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 24:317–48.

MIGOTTI, M. 1999. “Peirce’s Double Aspect Theory of Truth.” In C. Misak (ed.), Pragmatism, special issue of Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24:75–108.

MOORE, Matthew E. 2007. The Genesis of the Peircean Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43(3), 425–469.

MOORE, Matthew E. 2015. “Peirce’s Topical Theory of Continuity.” Synthese 192:4, 1055–1071.

NORMAN, J. 2003. Provability in Peirce’s Graphs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society.

NUBIOLA, Jaime (ed.). 1998. “Charles S. Peirce y la abducción”Analogía, 12:1.

OOSTRA, Arnold. 2001. “Simetría y Lógica: la notación de Peirce para los 16 conectivos binarios” (with Mireya García – Jhon Fredy Gómez), Memorias del XII Encuentro de Geometría y sus Aplicaciones, Bogotá, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, 1-26.

OOSTRA, Arnold. 2004. “La notación diagramática de C. S. Peirce para los conectivos proposicionales binarios,” Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias 28 (106), 57-70.

OOSTRA, Arnold. 2006. “Peirce y la matemática,” Anthropos 212, 151-59.

OOSTRA, Arnold. 2008. “Una reseña de la lógica matemática de Charles S. Peirce (1839–1914),” REVISTA Universidad EAFIT 44 (150), 9-20.

OOSTRA, Arnold. 2010.“Los gráficos Alfa de Peirce aplicados a la lógica intuicionista,” Cuadernos de Sistemática Peirceana 2, 25-60.

OOSTRA, Arnold. 2011. “Gráficos existenciales Beta intuicionistas,” Cuadernos de Sistemática Peirceana 3, 53-78.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2018. “Logic of Relatives and Semiotics in Peirce. From the “Subject-Predicate” Inferential Structure to the Synechistic Topology of Interpretation,” in How To Make Our Signs Clear, Boston: Brill, 36 – 58.

PECKHAUS, V. 1990/1991. „Ernst Schröder und die pasigraphischen Systeme von Peano und Peirce.“ Modern Logic 1 (2/3):174–205.

PONZIO, Julia. 2019. “Form and Non-Linear Continuity: The Development of the Idea of Cluster in Peirce’s Thought.” Semiotica 226, 153-168.

POUKHAEV Andrei. 2013. Inquiries into Cognition: L. Wittgenstein’s Language-Games and C. S. Peirce’s Semeiosis for the Philosophy of Cognition. Roma: Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana.

PUTNAM, Hilary. 1982. “Peirce as Logician.” Historia Mathematica 9:290–301.

PUTNAM, Hilary. 1992. Comments on the Lectures. In Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898, edited by K. L.Ketner, 55–102. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.

QUEIROZ, Joâo, DE MORAES, LAFAYETTE (coords.). 2013. A lógica de diagramas de Charles S. Peirce: Implicaçoes em ciencia cognitiva, lógica e semiótica. Sao Paulo: Editora UFJF.

QUINE, Willard Van Orman. 1989/1995. “Peirce’s Logic. ” In Peirce and Contemporary Thought, edited by K. L. Ketner, 23–31. New York: Fordham University Press.

RIVETTI BARBÒ, Francesca. 1964. L’Antinomia del Mentitore da Peirce a Tarski. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

ROBERTS, Don. 1973. The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton.

SARAN, Lucas Antonio. 2021. “As Diferenças Entre Os Pensamentos de Peirce E Russell Sobre Filosofia, Matemática, E Lógica,” Cognitio, 21:2, 285–299.

SEIBERT, C. (2005). “Charles Peirce’s Reading of Richard Whately’s Elements of Logic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 26(1), 1–32.

SHIELDS, Paul Bartram. 2012. Charles S. Peirce on the Logic of Number. Boston: Docent Press.

SHIN, Sun-Joo. 1994. The Logical Status of Diagrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SHIN, Sun-Joo. 2002. The Iconic Logic of Peirce’s Graphs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

SINI, Carlo. 1982. “Grafi esistenziali e categorie semiotiche in Peirce, in AA.VV.,” Logica matematica e psicanalisi. Peano, Vailati, Peirce, Milano: Spirali, III: 3, 124-132.

SINI, Carlo. 1979. “Attualità del socialismo logico di Peirce,” in «Cultura e scuola», n. 70: 129-139. [disponibile online su http://www.archiviocarlosini.it/bio-bibliografia/bibliografia-2/].

de WAAL, C. 2000. “The History of Peirce’s 1894 Logic Book.” Peirce Project Newsletter 3 (2):4–5.

WALSH, Alison. 2012. Relations between Logic and Mathematics in the Work of Benjamin and Charles S. Peirce. Boston, MA: Docente Press.

ZALAMEA, Fernando. 1993. “Una jabalina lanzada hacia el futuro: anticipos y aportes de C. S. Peirce a la lógica matemática del siglo XX,” Mathesis 9 (4), 391-404.

ZALAMEA, Fernando. 1997. Lógica topológica: una introducción a los gráficos existenciales de Peirce, Reportes del XV Coloquio Distrital de Matemáticas, Bogotá, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

ZALAMEA, Fernando. 2000. Ariel y Arisbe. Evolución y evaluación del concepto de América Latina en el siglo XX: una visión crítica desde la lógica contemporánea y la arquitectónica pragmática de C. S. Peirce, Bogotá, Convenio Andrés Bello.

ZALAMEA, Fernando. 2001. El continuo peirceano, Bogotá, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

ZALAMEA, Fernando. 2006. Signos triádicos. Lógicas  literaturas  artesNueve estudios latinoamericanos, México, Mathesis.

ZALAMEA, Fernando. 2012. Peirce’s Logic of Continuity. Boston: Docent Press.

ZALAMEA, Fernando. 2021. “Las lógicas diagramáticas de Llull y Peirce: trashumancia, triadicidad, geometrización,” Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 38 (Especial) :57–64.

Back to Table of Contents

Metaphysics and Cosmology

ANDERSON, Douglas. 1995. The Strands of System. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

ANDERSON, Douglas. 2012. Conversations on Peirce: Reals and Ideals. New York: Fordham University Press.   

BOLER, John F. 1963. Charles Peirce and Scholastic Realism. A Study of Peirce’s Relation to John Duns Scotus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

BOSCO Nynfa. 1977. Studio sul pragmatismo di C.S. Peirce. Dalla scienza alla metafisica. Torino: Giappichelli.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2014. “Peirce’s Fundamental Abduction: how Creativity entails Cosmology.” Cognitio-Estudos 11 (2): 157-166.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2015. “Il concetto di realtà secondo Peirce.” In Su Peirce, Massimo A. Bonfantini, Rossella Fabbrichesi, Salvatore Zingale (eds.), 79-90. Milano: Bompiani.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2016. “Hints toward Cosmology: the Need for Cosmology in Peirce’s Philosophy.” Scio 12: 51-73.

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2019. “Does Continuity allow for Emergence? An Emergentist Reading of Peirce’s evolutionary thought.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy XI, 2, pp. 1-24. 

BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina. 2020. Creativity between Experience and Cosmos: C.S. Peirce and A.N. Whitehead on Novelty. Freiburg im Breisgau: Verlag Karl Alber.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2011. “Varieties of Synechism. Peirce and James on Mind-World Continuity,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25:4, pp. 412-424.

CHAMPAGNE, Marc. 2015. “A less simplistic metaphysics: Peirce’s layered theory of meaning as a layered theory of being.” Sign Systems Studies 43.4: 523–559.

CHAMPAGNE, Marc. 2018. Consciousness and the Philosophy of Signs: How Peircean Semiotics combines Phenomenal Qualia and Practical Effects. New York: Springer.

ENGEL-TIERCELIN, Claudine. 1992. “Vagueness and the Unity of C. S. Peirce’s Realism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28:51–82.

ESPOSITO, Joseph L. 1980. Evolutionary Metaphysics. The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Categories. Ohio: Ohio University Press.          

ESPOSITO, Joseph L. 2005. Synechism: the Keystone of Peirce’s Metaphysics. In M. Bergman & J. Queiroz (Eds.), The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella & LEONI, Federico. 2005. Continuità e variazione. Leibniz, Goethe, Peirce, Wittgenstein, con un’incursione kantiana. Milano: Mimesis.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2019. “Spinoza, Emerson, and Peirce: Re-Thinking the Genealogy of Pragmatism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 55: 2, 103-118.

FORSTER, Paul. 1997. “Kant, Boole, and Peirce’s Early Metaphysics.” Synthese 113:1, 43–70.

FORSTER, Paul. 2011. Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

GOODWIN, R. 1961. “Charles S. Peirce: A Modern Scotist?” New Scholasticism 35:478–509.

GOUDGE, Thomas. 1947. “The Conflict of Naturalism and Transcendentalism in Peirce.” The Journal of Philosophy 44 (14): 365-375.

GUARDIANO, Nicholas. 2011. “The Intelligibility of Peirce’s Metaphysics of Objective Idealism.” Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia 12 (2): 187-204.

HAACK, Susan. 1977. “Pragmatism and Ontology: Peirce and James.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 31:377–400.

HAACK, Susan. 1992. “Extreme Scholastic Realism: Its Relevance to Philosophy of Science Today.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 28:19–50.

HAUSMAN, Carl R. 1993. Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HAVENEL, Jérôme. 2008. “Peirce’s clarifications of continuity.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 44(1), 86–133.

HAWKINS, Stephen B. 2007. “Desire and Natural Classification: Peirce and Aristotle on Final Cause.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 43:3, 521–541.

HOWAT, Andrew. 2014. “Peirce on Grounding the Laws of Logic.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50:4, 480–500.

HULSWIT, Menno. 2002. From Cause to Causation: A Peircean Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

IBRI, Ivo Assad. [1992] 2017. Kósmos Noetós: The Metaphysical Architecture of Charles S. Peirce. Translation by H. Mallett. Cham: Springer.      

KAAG, John J. 2011. “Hegel, Peirce, and Royce on the Concept of Essence.” Dialogue 50:3, 557–575.

LANE, Robert E. 2018. Peirce on Realism and Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LANE, Robert. 2011a. “The Final Incapacity: Peirce on Intuition and the Continuity of Mind and Matter, Part I.” Cognitio 12:1, 105–119.

LANE, Robert. 2011b. “The Final Incapacity: Peirce on Intuition and the Continuity of Mind and Matter, Part II.” Cognitio 12:2, 237–256.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2005. “Abduction and Metaphysical Realism.” Semiotica 153 (1): 243-259.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2009. Metafisica per assurdo. Peirce e i problemi dell’epistemologia contemporanea. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2017. “Scientific and not Scientistic: the Rich Realism of Pragmatism.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, LXXII (3), 401-414..

MARGOLIS, Joseph. 1993. “The Passing of Peirce’s Realism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29:293–330.

MAYORGA, Rosa María. 2007. From Realism to ‘Realicism’: The Metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lanham: Lexington Books.

MOORE, Edward C. 1952. “The Scholastic Realism of C. S. Peirce.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 12:406–17.

MOORE, Edward C. 1964. “The Influence of Duns Scotus on Peirce.” In E. C. Moore &R. Robin(eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 401–13.

MURPHEY, Murray. 1961. The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961.

MURPHEY, Murray. 1965. “On Peirce’s Metaphysics.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 1:12–25.

NESHER, D. 1981. “Peirce on Realism, Reality and Existence.” In K. L. Ketner (ed.), Proceedings of the C. S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press, 247–50.

NIINILUOTO, Ilkka. 1999. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

NORDMANN, Alfred. 2006. “Critical Realism, Critical Idealism, and Critical Common-Sensism: The School and World Philosophies of Riehl, Cohen, and Peirce.” In M. Friedman & A. Nordman (Eds.), The Kantian Legacy of Nineteenth-Century Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press, pp. 249–274.

O’CONNOR, D. D. 1964. “Peirce’s Debt to F. E. Abbot.” Journal of the History of Ideas 25:543–64.

OLEKSY, Mateusz W. 2015. Realism and Individualism: Charles S. Peirce and the Threat of Modern Nominalism. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

OLIVIER, Michel. 2013. Peirce: la pensée et le réel. Paris: Hermann.     

PAPE, Helmut. 2002. Der dramatische Reichtum der konkreten Welt: der Ursprung des Pragmatismus im Denken von Charles S. Peirce und William James. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

PIHLSTRÖM, Sami. 1996. Structuring the World: The Issue of Realism and the Nature of Ontological Problems in Classical and Contemporary Pragmatism.Acta Philosophica Fennica 59. Helsinki: The Philosophical Societyof Finland.

PIHLSTRÖM, Sami. 1998. “Peircean Scholastic Realism and Transcendental Arguments.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34:382–413.

PIHLSTRÖM, Sami. 2003. Naturalizing the Transcendental: A Pragmatic View. Amherst. N.Y: Prometheus/Humanity Books.

PIHLSTRÖM, Sami. 2012. “Peircean modal (and moral?) realism(s): remarks on the normative methodology of pragmatist metaphysics.” In Cornelis de Waal and Krzysztof Piotr Skowronski  (eds.), The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce, 231–58. New York: Fordham University Press.

POTTER, Vincent G. 1992. “Peirce on Substance and foundations”. The Monist 75 (4): 492–503.

RAPOSA, Michael L. 1984. “Habits and Essences”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20 (2): 147–167.

RIVERSO, E. 1957. Metafisica e scientismo: con un’appendice sulla logica di Charles Sanders Peirce. Napoli: Istituto Editoriale del Mezzogiorno.

RESCHER, Nicholas. 1996.  Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

RESCHER, Nicholas. 2000. Realistic Pragmatism: An Introduction to Pragmatic Philosophy. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.

REYES-CÁRDENAS, Paniel. 2018. “Duns Scotus and Peirce on the importance of Universals and Scientific Realism.” Escritos 26, 83-106.

REYNOLDS, Andrew. 2002. Peirce’s Scientific Metaphysics: The Philosophy of Chance, Law and Evolution. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

ROBERTS, Don. 1970. “On Peirce’s Realism.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 6: 67–83.

ROHATYN, D. 1983. “Peirce and the Defense of Realism: The Unfolding of Pragmatic Logic.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 19:45–61.

ROSENTHAL, Sandra B. 1968. “The would-be Present of C. S. Peirce.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 4:155–62.

SFENDONI-MENTZOU, Demetra. 1997. “Peirce on Continuity and Laws of Nature”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, vol. 33: 591-645.

SFENDONI-MENTZOU, Demetra. 2008. “C. S. Peirce and Aristotle on Time,” COGNITIO. Revista de Filosofia. Vol. 9 Numero 2: 261-280.

SORRELL, Kory S. 2001. “Peirce and a Pragmatic Reconception of Substance”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37 (2): 257–95.

STEARNS, Isabel. 1952. “Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, Philip P. Wiener and Frederic H. Young (eds.), 195-208. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

TIERCELIN, Claudine (ed.). 1986. “La Metáphysique de Peirce,” special issue of Philosophie 10, Éditions de Minuit, Paris.

TIERCELIN Claudine. 1998. “Peirce’s Objective Idealism: A Defence,” Transactions of the Peirce Society 1998 (1), 1-28.

TIERCELIN Claudine. 1999- “L’influence scotiste dans le projet peircien d’une métaphysique comme science,” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 83 (1), 117-34.

TIERCELIN Claudine. 2003. “Le projet peircien d’une métaphysique scientifique,” Cent ans de philosophie américaine, (eds.) J.-P. Cometti & C. Tiercelin, Pau, Presses de l’Université de Pau, 157-82.

TURLEY, Peter T. 1977. Peirce’s Cosmology. New York: Philosophical Library.

VENTIMIGLIA, Michael. 2008. “Reclaiming the Peircean Cosmology: Existential Abduction and the Growth of the Self.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4): 661-680.

de WAAL, Cornelis. 1996. “The Real Issue between Nominalism and Realism: Peirce and Berkeley Reconsidered.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 32:425–42.

de WAAL. Cornelis. 1998. “Peirce’s Nominalist–Realist Distinction, an Untenable Dualism.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 34:183–202.

WILSON, Aaron B. 2016. Peirce’s empiricism : its roots and its originality. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.

Back to Table of Contents

Peirce and the Sciences

AMBROSIO, Chiara. 2016. “Composite Photographs and the Quest for Generality: Themes from Peirce and Galton.” Critical Inquiry 42(3), 547–579.

AMBROSIO Chiara, CAMPBELL Chris. 2017. “The Chemistry of Relations: Peirce, Perspicuous Representations and Experiments with Diagrams.” In Atkins R., Hull K. (eds.), Peirce on perception and ReasoningFrom Icons to Logic. New York / London: Routledge.

ANDRADE, Eugenio. 1999. “Natural selection and Maxwell demon’s: a Semiotic approach to Evolutionary Biology,” Semiotica 127 (1) (special issue Biosemiotica, eds. Hoffmeyer & Emmeche), 133-49.

ANDRADE, Eugenio. 2000. Los demonios de Darwin: Semiótica y Termodinámica de la Evolución biológicas, Bogotá, Unibiblos.

ANDRADE, Eugenio. 2007. “The Semiotic Framework of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology,” Biosystems 90 (2), 389-404.

ANDRADE, Eugenio. 2008. “From a dynamical to a semiotic account of emergence,” Cybernetics and Human Knowing 15 (3-4), 87-96.

ANDRADE, Eugenio. 2009. La ontogenia del pensamiento evolutivo, Bogotá, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

ATKINS, Richard Kenneth. 2006. “Restructuring the Sciences: Peirce’s Categories and His Classification of the Sciences.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42:4, 483–500.

ATKINS, Richard Kenneth. 2017. “Peirce, Muybridge, and the Moving Pictures of Thought.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53:4, 511–527.

AYIM, Maryann. 1982. Peirce’s View of the Role of Reason and Instinct in Scientific Inquiry. Meerut, India: Anu Prakashan.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2013. “Diagrammatic Reasoning. Some Notes on Charles S. Peirce and Friedrich A. Lange.” History and Philosophy of Logic 34(4), 293–305.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2015. “Logic, Psychology, and Apperception. C. S. Peirce and J. F. Herbart.” Journal of the History of Ideas 76(1), 69–91.

BENEDUCE, R. 1986. I modi del pensiero secondo Charles S. Peirce: dalla critica dell’introspezionismo alla fondazione logica della psicologia. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

BERGMAN, Mats. 2010. “Serving Two Masters: Peirce on Pure Science, Useless Things, and Practical Applications.” In M Bergman, A.V. Pietarinen, and H. Rydenfelt(eds.), Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce ConferenceNordic Studies in Pragmatism 1. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, 17–37.

BERTILSSON, Thora Margareta. 2009. Peirce’s Theory of Inquiry and Beyond: towards a Social Reconstruction of Science Theory. Frankfurt: Lang.

BRAUDE, S. E. 1998. “Peirce on the Paranormal.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34(1), 203–224.

BURKE, Tom. 2014. “Extended Mind and Representation,” in Pragmatist neurophilosophy. American philosophy and the brain, Shook, John R., Solymosi Tibor (eds.), New York/London, Bloomsbury Publishing,177-202.

CADWALLADER, Thomas C. 1974. “Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914): the first American experimental psychologist.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 10(3), 291–298.

CADWALLADER, Thomas C. 1975. “Peirce as an Experimental Psychologist.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 11(3), 167-187.

CALCATERRA, Rosa Maria. 2006. “Psicologia e normatività epistemica. Figure dell’esternalismo,” in R. M. Calcaterra (a cura di), Le ragioni del conoscere e dell’agire. Scritti in onore di Rosaria Egidi, Milano: Franco Angeli, 30-43.

CARAVÀ, Marta. 2015. “La nozione di “mente estesa” tra scienze cognitive, semiotica e pragmatismo. Alcune riflessioni a partire dal tema del linguaggio,” Rivista Italiana Di Filosofia Del Linguaggio, 2015, Numero Speciale, pp. 139 – 151.

CARAVÀ, Marta. 2019. “The Threshold of Representations. Integrating Semiotics and the Cognitive Sciences,” Versus, 48, 157 – 173.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 1995. “Notes For a Sketch of a Peircean Theory of the Unconscious.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31(3), 482–506.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2003. “The Space of Signs: C.S. Peirce’s Critique of Psychologism.” In Jacquette, D. (ed.), Philosophy, Psychology, and Psychologism: Critical and Historical Readings on the Psychological Turn in Philosophy. Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic.

COWLES, Henry M. 2016. The age of methods: William Whewell, Charles Peirce, and scientific kinds. Isis, 107(4), 722–737.

CRISTALLI Claudia. 2017. “Experimental Psychology and the Practice of Logic. Charles S. Peirce and the Charge of Psychologism, 1869-1885.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IX: 1.

CRISTALLI, Claudia, PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. 2021. “Abstraction and Generalization in the Logic of Science: Cases from Nineteenth-Century Scientific Practice.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 11.

ENGEL-TIERCELIN, C. 1986. “Peirce on machines, self control and intentionality,” in The Mind and the Machine: Philosophical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, S. Torrance ed., Chichester: Sussex, 99-113.

ENGEL, Andreas K., MAYE Alexander, KURTHEN Martin, KÖNING Peter. 2013. “Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science,” Trends in Cognitive Science 17 (5), pp. 202-209.

ESPOSITO, Joseph L. 1977. “Peirce and Naturphilosophie.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 13(2), 122–141.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2011. “Effects of Truth: the Darwinian Revolution and its Impact on Pragmatism,” in R. Frega ed., Pragmatist Epistemologies, Lanham (MD): Lexington Books, 153-173.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2016. “Peirce, Mead and the theory of Extended Mind,” in The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies. New Edition, Bergman Mats, Queiroz Joao (eds.). Open Source.

GALLAGHER, Shaun. 2014. “Pragmatic interventions into enactive and extended conceptions of cognition,” Philosophical Issues 24, pp. 110-126.

GALLAGHER, Shaun. 2017. Enactivist interventions. Rethinking the mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

GIREL, Mathias. 2003. “The metaphysics and logic of psychology: Peirce’s reading of James’s principles.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 39(2), 163–203.

HAACK, Susan. 1992. “Extreme Scholastic Realism: Its Relevance to Philosophy of Science Today.” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 28:19–50.

HAAPARANTA, L. 2002. “On Peirce’s Methodology of Logic and Philosophy.” Cognitio 3, 32–45.

HACKING, Ian. 1980. “The Theory of Probable Inference: Neyman, Peirce, and Braithwaite.” In D. H. Mellor (ed.), Science, Belief and Behavior: Essays in Honour of R. B. Braithwaite, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–60.

HACKING, Ian. 1988. “Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design.” Isis, 79(3), 427-451.

HAUSMAN, C. 1990. “In and Out of Percepts.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26, 271–308.

HULL, Kathleen A. 2017. “The Iconic Peirce: Geometry, Spatial Intuition, and Visual Imagination.” In Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic, ed. Kathleen A. Hull and Richard Kenneth Atkins. New York: Routledge, 147–173.

HUMPHREYS, Justin. 2019. “Subconscious inference in Peirce’s epistemology of perception.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 55(3), 326–346.

JACQUETTE, Dale. 2003. Philosophy, Psychology, and Psychologism: Critical and Historical Readings on the Psychological Turn in Philosophy. Dordrecht; London: Kluwer Academic.

JOHNSON, Mark & Rohrer, Tim. 2007. “We are living creatures: embodiment, American pragmatism, and the cognitive organism,” in Body, language, and mind, Zlatev Jordan et al. (eds.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17-54.

JUNG, Mathias & MADZIA, Roman. 2016. Pragmatism and embodied cognitive science: from bodily intersubjectivity to symbolic articulation, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

KAMMERZELL, F., LAPČIĆ, A., & NÖTH, W. 2016. “Charles S. Peirce’s egyptological studies.”  Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 52(4), 483–538.

KETNER, Kenneth. L. 1988. “Peirce and Turing: Comparisons and Conjectures.” Semiotica 68 (1–2), 33–61.

KYRIAZIS, G.A., 2021. “On Peirce’s 1878 Article ‘The Probability of Induction’: A Conceptualistic Appraisal,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 75:1, 1–20.

LENZEN, Victor F. 1965. The Contributions of Charles S . Peirce to Metrology. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 109(1), 29–46.

MAGNANI, Lorenzo. 2001. Abduction, Reason and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation. New York: Kluwer.

MAYO, Deborah G. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

MOORE, Edward C. (ed.). 1993. Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science. Papers from the Harvard Sesquicentennial Congress. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

MURGIANO, Margherita. 2015. “Pensiero e azione: l’habit peirceano tra enattivismo e cognizione distribuita,” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, “Filosofia del linguaggio, semiotica e filosofia della mente. A partire da c. S. Peirce nei cento anni dalla morte”, 192-202.

OLTEANU, Alin. 2015. Philosophy of Education in the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce: A Cosmology of Learning and Loving. Bern, New York: Peter Lang.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2011. “The external mind: semiotics, pragmatism, extended mind and distributed cognition,” Versus 112-113, pp. 69-96.

PEARCE, Trevor. 2018. “‘Protoplasm Feels’: The Role of Physiology in Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Metaphysics.” HOPOS 8, 28–61.

PEARCE, Trevor. 2020. Pragmatism’s Evolution: Organism and Environment in American Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

PLOWRIGHT, David. 2016. Charles Sanders Peirce: Pragmatism and Education. Dordrecht: Springer.

QUAY, John. 2013. Education, Experience, and Existence: Engaging Dewey, Peirce and Heidegger. New York, Routledge.

ROMANINI, Vinicius & FERNÁNDEZ, Eliseo. 2014. Peirce and Biosemiotics: A Guess at the Riddle of Life. Dordrecht: Springer.

SANTARELLI, Matteo. 2017. “Security as Completeness. A Peircean Semiotic Reading of the Psychology of Attachment.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IX: 1.

SCOTT, Frances William. 2006. “C.S. Peirce’s System of Science: Life as a Laboratory.” Elsah, IL: Press of Arisbe Associate.

SHOOK, John & SOLYMOSI, Tibor (eds.). 2014. Pragmatist Neurophilosophy. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

SOLYMOSI, Tibor. 2014. Neuroscience, Neurophilosophy, and Pragmatism: Brains at Work in the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

TIERCELIN Claudine. 1995. “Peirce’s Relevance for Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Science,” Acta Philosophica Fennica 58, 37-74.

TURLEY, Peter T. 1977. Peirce’s Cosmology. New York: Philosophical Library.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2019. “From Vague Symbols to Contested Concepts: Peirce, W. B. Gallie, and History,” History and Theory 58(2), 233-251.

WIENER, Philip P. 1949. Evolution and the Founders of Pragmatism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Back to Table of Contents

Peirce, Pragmatism and Other Traditions

ANDERSON, Paul R. & FISCH, Max H. 1939. Philosophy in America: from the Puritans to James: with Representative Selections. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

BAGHRAMIAN, Maria & MARCHETTI, Sarin. 2017. Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology before the Great Divide. New York: Routledge.

BONCOMPAGNI, Anna. 2016. Wittgenstein and Pragmatism: On Certainty in the Light of Peirce and James. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

BURKE, Thomas F.   2013. What Pragmatism Was. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.          

CALCATERRA, Rosa M. 2003. Pragmatismo: i valori dell’esperienza: letture di Peirce, James e Mead. Roma: Carocci.

CALDWELL, William, SHOOK, John R, & WESTPHAL, Kenneth (eds.). 2001. Early Critics of Pragmatism. III, Pragmatism and Idealism, Bristol: Thoemes.

CELANO, Bruno et al. 1990. Filosofie per Intersezione: Saggi su Aristotele, Leibniz, Peirce, Bloch, Heidegger, Ricoeur. Palermo: L’Epos.

CONKIN, Paul K. 1976. Puritans and Pragmatists: Eight Eminent American Thinkers. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.      

DEBROCK, Guy. 2003. Process Pragmatism. Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella e SINI, Carlo. 1993. Variazioni sul foglio mondo. Peirce, Wittgenstein, la scrittura, Como: Hestia.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 2001. Continuità e vaghezza: Leibniz, Goethe, Peirce, Wittgenstein. Milano: CUEM.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 2002. Cosa significa dirsi pragmatisti: Peirce e Wittgenstein a confronto. Milano: CUEM.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2014. Peirce e Wittgenstein: Un Incontro: Immagine, Prassi, Credenza. Milano; Udine: Mimesis.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2017. The Iconic Ground of Gestures: Peirce, Wittgenstein, and Foucault, in Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: from Icons to Logic, K. Hull and R. Atkins eds., London & New York: Routledge, pp.54-60.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella & BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina (eds.). 2017. Pragmatism. Some New Ways of Thinking for an Old Name, Monographic Issue, “Rivista di Storia della Filosofia”, n. 3.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella & BRIOSCHI, Maria Regina (eds.). 2017. Pragmatism. Some New Ways of Thinking for an Old Name, Monographic Issue, “Rivista di Storia della Filosofia”, n. 3.

FISCH, Max H. 1986. Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism. K. L. Ketner y C. Kloesel eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

FISCH, Max H. 1996. Classic American Philosophers. New York: Fordham University Press.

FLOWER, Elizabeth & MURPHEY, Murray G. 1977. A History of Philosophy in America, vols. 1-2. New York: Capricorn Books.   

FOUST, Matthew A. 2017. Confucianism and American Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

FOXE, Arthur Norman. 1962. The Common Sense from Heraclitus to Peirce: The Sources, Substance, and Possibilities of the Common Sense. New York: Tunbridge Press.

FREEMAN, E. & SKOLIMOWSKI, H. 1974. “The Search for Objectivity in Peirce and Popper.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 464–519. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.

GAVA, Gabriele & STERN, Robert. 2016.  Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy. New York: Routledge. 

GOETZMANN, William H. 2009. Beyond the Revolution: A History of American Thought from Paine to Pragmatism. New York: Basic Books.      

GRIFFIN, David Ray. 1993. Founders of Constructive Postmodern Philosophy: Peirce, James, Bergson, Whitehead, and Hartshorne. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

GULLVÅG, I. 1981.“Wittgenstein and Peirce.” In Wittgenstein – Aesthetics and Transcendental Philosophy, edited by K. S. Johannesen and T. Nordenstam, 70–85. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.

HAACK, Susan. 1997. “‘We Pragmatists …’; Peirce and Rorty in Conversation.” Partisan Review 64:91–107.

HAACK, Susan P. 2006. Pragmatism, Old & New: Selected Writings. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.

HOOKWAY, Christopher J. 1997. “Logical Principles and Philosophical Attitudes: Peirce’s Response to James’s Pragmatism.” In The Cambridge Companion to William James, edited by R. A. Putnam, 145–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HOOKWAY, Christopher. 2012. The Pragmatic Maxim: Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.       

HOUSER, Nathan. 2007. “Azione e rappresentazione nel pragmatismo di Peirce” (“Action and Representation in Peirce’s Pragmatism”), Pragmatismo e filosofia analitica, Differenze e interazioni, Calcaterra, R., ed., Rome, Quodlibet; later appeared in English in Pragmatism and Analytic Philosophy (New York and Amsterdam, Rodopi Press).

HOUSER, Nathan. 2010. “The Church of Pragmatism”, Semiotica, 178, (1/4), pp. 105–114.

HOUSER, Nathan. 2010. “Reconsidering Peirce’s Relevance”, Ideas in Action, Bergman, M., Paavola, S., Pietarinen, A. & Rydenfelt, H., eds., Helsinki, Nordic Pragmatism Network, pp. 1–16.

HOUSER, Nathan. 2011. “Peirce’s Post-Jamesian Pragmatism.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3(1), 39-60.

IBRI, Ivo A. 2017. “The Double Face of Habits: Time and Timeless in Pragmatic Experience.” Rivista Di Storia Della Filosofia 72(3):455-474.

INNIS, Robert E. 1999. Peirce and Polanyi: Perceptual Consciousness and the Structures of Meaning, in Shapiro, Michael (ed.), The Peirce Seminar Papers, v.4. New York, Berghahn Book.

JOHNSON, Mark & Rohrer, Tim. 2007. “We are living creatures: embodiment, American pragmatism, and the cognitive organism,” in Body, language, and mind, Zlatev Jordan et al. (eds.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17-54.

JUNG, Mathias & MADZIA, Roman. 2016. Pragmatism and embodied cognitive science: from bodily intersubjectivity to symbolic articulation, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

KILPINEN, Erkki. 2000. The Enormous Fly-Wheel of Society: Pragmatism’s Habitual Conception of Action and Social Theory. Research Report 235. Helsinki: Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.

LEGG, Catherine. “Peirce and Sellars on Nonconceptual Content” in Sellars and the History of Modern Philosophy, ed. Luca Corti and Antonio Nunziante, New York: Routledge.

MADDALENA, Giovanni e TUZET, Giovanni (eds.). 2007. I Pragmatisti italiani. Tra alleati e nemici. Milano: Albo Versorio.

MADDEN, Edward. 1963. Chauncey Wright and Foundations of Pragmatism. Seatle: University of Washington Press.      

MALACHOWSKI, Alan. 2013. The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MARCHETTI, Giancarlo (a c. di). 1999. Il Neopragmatismo. Con contributi di Richard Bernstein. Firenze: Nuova Italia.

MARCHETTI, Giancarlo, MADDALENA Giovanni, & CALCATERRA, Rosa M. 2015. Il Pragmatismo: Dalle Origini Agli Sviluppi Contemporanei. Roma: Carocci.                       

MENARY, Richard. 2016. “Pragmatism and the pragmatic turn in cognitive science,” in The pragmatic turn. Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science, Engel Andreas, Friston, Karl J., Kragic Danica (eds.), Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, pp. 215-234.

MEYERS, Robert G. 1999. “Pragmatism and Peirce’s externalist epistemology,” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society, 35(4), pp. 638-653.

MISAK, Cheryl. 2013. The American Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MISAK, Cheryl. 2016. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MORRIS, Charles. 1970. The Pragmatic Movement in American Philosophy. New York: Braziller.

MOORE, Edward C. 1961. American Pragmatism: Peirce, James and Dewey. Westport: Greenword Press. 

MOUNCE, H. O. 1997. The Two Pragmatisms: From Peirce to Rorty. London and New York: Routledge.

MULLIN, Albert A. 1961. Philosophical Comments on the Philosophies of Charles S. Peirce and Ludwig Wittgenstein. Urbana: Electrical Engineering Research Laboratory, University of Illinois.

MURPHY, John P. 1990. Pragmatism. From Peirce to Davidson. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

NASCIMENTO, Edna M. 2017. Pragmatismo. Una filosofia da açâo: de Dewey a Paulo Freire. Teresina, Brasil: EDUFPI.

NGUYEN, Nam T. 2011. Nature’s Primal Self: Peirce, Jaspers, and Corrington. Lanham: Lexington Books.

NUBIOLA, Jaime. 2012. “New Developments Regarding Peirce’s Reception in the Hispanic World,” Inter-American Journal of Philosophy 3 (1), 86-94.

OPPENHEIM, Frank M. 2004. Reverence for the Relations of Life: Re-imagining Pragmatism via Josiah Royce’s Interactions with Peirce, James, and Dewey. Notre Dame, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press.                      

POPKIN, R., and MEYERS, R. 1993. “Early Influences on Peirce.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 31:607–21.

RAPOSA, Michael L. 1984. “Habits and Essences. ” Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society 20:147-68.

RICHARDSON, Joan. 2007. A Natural History of Pragmatism: the Fact of Feeling from Jonathan Edwards to Gertrude Stein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

RICHARDSON, Joan. 2014. Pragmatism and American Experience. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ROGERS, Arthur K. 1922. English and American Philosophy since 1800: A Critical Survey. New York: Macmillan.        

ROSENTHAL, Sandra B. 1994. Charles Peirce’s Pragmatic Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

ROSENTHAL, Sandra, HAUSMAN, Carl R. & ANDERSON, Douglas R. (eds.). 1999. Classical American Pragmatism: its Contemporary Vitality. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.        

ROTH, Robert J. 1993. British Empiricism and American Pragmatism. New York: Fordham University Press.    pragmatism, history of philosophy   

ROY, Jean-Michel. 2015. « Pragmatisme cognitif et énactivisme », Intellectica, 60, pp. 69-90.

SANTUCCI, Antonio. 1995. Empirismo, Pragmatismo, Filosofia Italiana. Bolonia: Clueb.

SHOOK, John R. & MARGOLIS, Joseph. 2006. A Companion to Pragmatism. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

STEBBING, Susan. 2013. Pragmatism and French Voluntarism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

STEINER, Pierre. 2013. «Pragmatisme(s) et sciences cognitives: considérations liminaires », Intellectica, 60, pp. 7-48.

STERN, Robert. 2013a. “An Hegelian in a Strange Costume? On Peirce’s Relation to Hegel I.” Philosophy Compass 8:1, 53–62.

STERN, Robert. 2013b. “An Hegelian in a Strange Costume? On Peirce’s Relation to Hegel II.” Philosophy Compass 8:1, 63–72.

STERN, Robert. 2007. “Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Secondness.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50:2, 123–155.

STERN, Robert (Ed.). 2018. Idealism and Pragmatism. Traditions in Dialogue. London and New York: Routledge.

THAYER, Horace S. 1984. Meaning and Action. A Critical History of Pragmatism. Indianapolis: Hackett.           

TIERCELIN Claudine. 2000. “Wittgenstein et Peirce,” La philosophie autrichienne: spécificités et influences, Tunis, Publications de l’Université de Tunis, ed. by M. Ouelbani, 46-74.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2018. « Comment naît un symbole ? Une comparaison entre Charles S. Peirce et George H. Mead, » Pragmata: Revue d’études pragmatistes 1, 60-91.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2019. “Articulate Reason and Its Elusive Background. Notes on Josiah Royce’s Late Reading of Peirce,” Pragmatism Today 10/2, 63-72.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2020. “Habit, Contingency and Love. On Charles S. Peirce and Félix Ravaisson,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy.

WERNECKE, Jörg. 2007. Handeln und Bedeutung: L. Wittgenstein, Ch. S. Peirce und M. Heidegger zu einer Propädeutik einer hermeneutischen Pragmatik. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.

WESEP, H. B Van. 1960. Seven Sages: The Story of American Philosophy: Franklin, Emerson, James, Dewey, Santayana, Peirce and Whitehead. New York: Longman, Green.

WEST, Cornel. 1989. The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism. Hampshire: The MacMillan Press.

WHITE, Morton (ed.). 1972. Documents in History of American Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

WHITE, Morton. 1973. Pragmatism and the American Mind. Essays and Reviews in Philosophy and Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.

WILSHIRE, Bruce. 2000. The Primal Roots of American Philosophy: Pragmatism, Phenomenology and Native American Thought. University Park: Penn State Press.

Back to Table of Contents

Phenomenology and Theory of Categories

ATKINS, Richard K. 2012. “A Guess at the Other Riddle: The Peircean Material Categories.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48(4):530-557.

 ATKINS, Richard K. 2012. “Broadening Peirce’s Phaneroscopy: Part One.” The Pluralist 7(2):1-29. 

ATKINS, Richard K. 2013. “Broadening Peirce’s Phaneroscopy: Part Two.” The Pluralist 8(1):97-114.

ATKINS, Richard K. 2016. “Direct inspection and phaneroscopic analysis.” Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 52(1), 1–20.

ATKINS, Richard K. 2018. Charles S. Peirce’s Phenomenology: Analysis and Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.

ATKINS, Richard K. 2019. “Semiotics and Phenomenality.” Journal of Mind and Behavior 40(1):67-82.

BALLABIO, Alessandro. 2016. Experiencia y Creatividad En C. S. Peirce y M. Merleau-Ponty. Bogotà: Editorial Aula de Humanidades.

CALCATERRA, Rosa M. 2005. Semiotica e fenomenologia del sé. Torino: Nino Aragno Editore.

CASEY, Edward S. 2015. “Phenomenology at the Edge of its Orbit.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 42(1-2):213-220.

CHAMPAGNE, Marc. 2014. “Referring to the Qualitative Dimension of Consciousness: Iconicity Instead of Indexicality.” Dialogue 53:1, 135–182.

CHAMPAGNE, Marc. 2014. “Just do it: Schopenhauer and Peirce on the Immediacy of Agency.”Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy (Revue Canadienne De Philosophie Continentale) 18(2):209-232.

CHAMPAGNE, Marc. 2018. Consciousness and the Philosophy of Signs: How Peircean Semiotics combines Phenomenal Qualia and Practical Effects. New York: Springer.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2005. “Conjectures concerning an uncertain faculty claimed for humans.” Semiotica, 153, 413–430.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2006. “Toward a Pragmatic Conception of Practical Identity.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42(2), 173–205.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2014. “The ineffable, the individual, and the intelligible: Peircean reflections on the innate ingenuity of the human animal.” In Vinicius Romanini and Eliseo Fernández (eds.), Peirce and Biosemiotics: A Guess at the Riddle of Life, 127–150. New York: Springer.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2015. “C. S. Peirce’s Phenomenological Categories: Their Basic Form, Recursive Elaboration, and Heuristic Purpose.” Journal Phänomenologie 44, 10–20.

COOKE, Elizabeth F. 2011. “Phenomenology of Error and Surprise: Peirce, Davidson, and McDowell.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47(1):62-86.

De TIENNE, André. 1996. L’analytique de la représentation chez Peirce. Bruxelles: Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis.

De TIENNE, André. 2000. “Quand l’apparence (se) fait signe: la genèse de la représentation chez Peirce.” Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry20(1), 95–144.

De TIENNE, André. 2004. “Is Phaneroscopy as a Pre-semiotic Science Possible?” on Arisbe: The Peirce Gateway.

De TIENNE, André. 2005. “The Sign in Person.” In Jornada CEPE [Centro de Estudios Peirceanos], 28–38.

DOWNARD, Jeffrey Brian. 2015. “The Main Questions and Aims Guiding Peirce’s Phenomenology.” Cognitio 16:1, 87–102.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1983. La polemica sull’iconismo (1964-1975), Napoli: ESI.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1986. Sulle Tracce del Segno. Firenze: Nuova Italia Editrice.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 1992. Il concetto di relazione in Peirce. Milano: Jaca Book.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella & SINI, Carlo. 1993. Variazioni sul foglio mondo. Peirce, Wittgenstein, la scrittura. Como: Hestia.

FUHRMAN, Gary. 2013. “Peirce’s Retrospectives on His Phenomenological Quest.” Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society 49(4):490-508

GARTENBERG, Zachary Micah. 2012. “Intelligibility and Subjectivity in Peirce: A Reading of His ‘New List of Categories.’” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50:4, 581–610.

HOUSER, Nathan. 1989. “La structure formelle de l’expérience selon Peirce.” Études Phénoménologiques, 5(9–10), 77–111.

HOUSER, Nathan. 2010. “Peirce, Phenomenology, and Semiotics”, The Routledge Companion to Semiotics, Paul Cobley, P., ed., City, Routledge.

HOUSER, Nathan. 2015. “Being in the world.” Sign Systems Studies 43.4: 560–575.

HULL, Kathleen A. & ATKINS, Richard K. 2017. Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: from Icons to Logic. New York: Routledge.

KEMPLE, Brian. 2019. The Intersection of Semiotics and Phenomenology. Peirce and Heidegger in Dialogue. Boston / Berlin: De Gruyter / Mouton. 

LANIGAN, Richard L. 2014. “Charles S. Peirce on Phenomenology: Communicology, Codes, and Messages; Or, Phenomenology, Synechism, and Fallibilism.” The American Journal of Semiotics 30(1-2):139-158.

LEGG, Catherine. 2014. “‘Things Unreasonably Compulsory’: A Peircean Challenge to a Humean Theory of Perception, Particularly with Respect to Perceiving Necessary Truths.” Cognitio 15:1, 89–112.

LUISI, Maria. 2012. Peirce e la fenomenologia.Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

O’CONNOR, D. D. 1964. “Peirce’s Debt to F. E. Abbot.” Journal of the History of Ideas 25:543–64.

PAPE, Helmut. 1989. Erfahrung und Wirklichkeit als Zeichenprozess: Charles S. Peirces entwurf einer spekulativen Grammatik des Seins. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

PAPE, Helmut (ed.). 2015. Peirce und die Phänomenologie. Special Issue of Journal Phänomenologie 44.

PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. 2006. “Interdisciplinarity and Peirce’s classification of the sciences: A centennial reassessment.” Perspectives on Science, 14(2), 127–152.

ROSENSOHN, William L. 1974. The Phenomenology of C. S. Peirce: From the Doctrine of Categories to Phaneroscopy. Amsterdam: Grüner.

ROSENTHAL, S. B., & BOURGEOIS, P. L. 1980. Pragmatism and Phenomenology: A Philosophic Encounter. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.

SINI, Carlo. 1979. “Il problema del segno in Husserl e in Peirce,” in Quaderni di Filosofia» 57, 543-558 [disponibile online].

SPIEGELBERG, Herbert. 1956. “Husserl’s and Peirce’s phenomenologies: coincidence or interaction.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17(2), 164–85.

de WAAL, Cornelis. 2015. “Peirce and Husserl on Making Science and Philosophy Rigorous.” Journal Phänomenologie, 44, 73–88.

Back to Table of Contents

Philosophy of Religion

ANDERSON, Douglas. 1990. “Three Appeals in Peirce’s Neglected Argument.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26:3, 349–362.

ANDERSON, Douglas. 2004. “Peirce’s Common Sense Marriage of Religion and Science.” In Cheryl Misak(ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175–193.

ATKINS, R. 2016. Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ATKINS, Richard Kenneth. 2018. “Peirce’s Modal Defense of Infant Baptism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54:4, 546-567.

ATKINS, Richard Kenneth. “Royce’s The Problem of Christianity and Peirce’s Epistemology,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 41:2–3, 39–55.

AYIM, Maryann. 1982. Peirce’s View of the Roles of Reason and Instinct in Scientific Inquiry. Meerut, India: Anu Prakashan.

BARRENA, Sara. 2008. “El ‘Argumento Olvidado’ de C. S. Peirce cien años después: Dios, juego y símbolo, Methodus 3, 23-45.

BRANDON, Daniel-Hughes. 2018. “Ubiquitous Inquiry: Peircean Possibilities in the Practice and Study of Religion.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54:4, 486-514.

CLANTON, J. Caleb. 2014. “The Structure of C. S. Peirce’s Neglected Argument for the Reality of God: A Critical Assessment.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50:2, 175–200.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 1997. Reason, Experience and God. New York: Fordham University Press.

DANIEL, Marta. 2012. Pragmatismo e religione : gli scritti teologici di C. S. Peirce. Milano: Albo versorio.

EJSING, Anette. 2007. Theology of Anticipation: A Constructive Study of C. S. Peirce. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.

GAVIN, William J. 1980. “Peirce and the ‘Will to Believe.’” The Monist 63:3, 342–350.

GESCHE, Linde. 2018. “The Semiotic Structure of Peirce’s Humble Argument with Brief Remarks on Different Kinds of Abducent Signs,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54:4, 515-531.

HULL, Kathleen. 2005. “The Inner Chambers of His Mind: Peirce’s‘Neglected Argument’ for God as Related to Mathematical Experience.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41:3, 483–513.

NEVILLE, Robert C. 2009. Realism in Religion: A Pragmatist’s Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

NIEMOCZYNSKI, Leon J. 2011. Charles Sanders Peirce and a Religious Metaphysics of Nature. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

ORANGE, Donna. 1980. The Development of Peirce’s Theism. Ph.D. dissertation. Fordham University.

ORANGE, Donna M. 1984. Peirce’s Conception of God. A Developmental Study. Lubbock: Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism.

PARKER, Kelly A. 1990. “C. S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Religion.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):193–212.

POLKE, Christian. 2018. “Royce and Peirce – Two Models of a Personal Divine?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54:4, 532-545.

POPE, Michael. “Peircean Faith: Perception, Trust, and Religious Belief in the Conduct of Life.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54:4, 457-479.

POTTER, Vincent G. 1972. “Vaguely Like a Man: The Theism of Charles S. Peirce.” In R. Roth(ed.), God, Knowable and Unknowable, New York: Fordham University Press, 241–54.

POTTER, Vincent G. 1976. “C. S. Peirce’s Argument for God’s Reality: A Pragmatist’s View.” In  J. Armenti (ed.), The Papin Festschrift, Villanova: Villanova University Press, 224–44.

RAPOSA, Michael L. 1989. Peirce’s Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

RAPOSA, Michael L. 2018. “On Reading God’s Great Poem: A Delayed Response to Christopher Hookway.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54:4.

RAPOSA, Michael L. 2020. Theosemiotic: Religion, Reading, and the Gift of Meaning. Fordham.

ROHAYTN, Dennis. 1982. “Resurrecting Peirce’s “Neglected Argument” for God’s Reality.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18:1, 66–74.

ROSENBAUM, Stuart E. 2003. Pragmatism and Religion: Classical Sources and Original Essays. Urbana, Chicago: University of Illinois.

SALAS, Elizabeth. 2009. “Abduction and the Origin of “Musement”: Peirce’s Neglected Argument for the Reality of God,” International Philosophical Quarterly 49(4): 459-471.

SLATER, Gary. 2015. C. S. Peirce and the Nested Continua Model of Religious Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

STANGO, Marco. 2019. “Can Thomism and Pragmatism cooperate?” International Philosophical Quarterly 59 (4): 467–84.

TRAMMELL, Richard L. 1972. “Religion, Instinct, and Reason in the Thought of C. S. Peirce.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 8:1, 3–25.

TRAMMELL, Richard L. 1973. “Charles Sanders Peirce and Henry James the Elder.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 9:4, 202–220.

VETTER, Martin. 1999. Zeichen deuten auf Gott: der zeichentheoretische Beitrag von Charles S. Peirce zur Theologie der Sakramente. Marburg: Elwert.

de WAAL, Cornelis. 2012. “Who’s Afraid of Charles Sanders Peirce?: Knocking Some Critical Common Sense into Moral Philosophy.” In Cornelis de Waal & Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński(eds.), The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. New York: Fordham University Press, 83–100.

WOELL, John W. 2012. Peirce, James, and a Pragmatic Philosophy of Religion. New York: Continuum.

Back to Table of Contents

Semiotics and Philosophy of Communication

AMBROSIO, Chiara, BERGMAN, Mats, GAVA, Gabriele. and LEGG, Catherine. (eds.). 2017. Peirce on Indexicality. Recherches Semiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry, 2 vols.

ANDERMATT, Alois. 2007. Semiotik und das Erbe der Transzendentalphilosophie: die Semiotischen Theorien von Ernst Cassirer und Charles Sanders Peirce im Vergleich. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

APEL, Karl-Otto. 1999. From a Trascendental-Semiotic Point of View. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

ATÃ Pedro, QUEIROZ Jõao. 2014. “Icon and abduction: situatedness in Peircean cognitive semiotics,” in Model-based reasoning in science and technology. Theoretical and cognitive issues, Magnani Lorenzo (ed.), Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer, pp. 301-314.

ATÃ Pedro, QUEIROZ Jõao. 2016. “Habit in semiosis: two different perspectives based on hierarchical multi-level system modeling and niche construction theory,” in Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit. Before and beyond consciousness, West Donna, Anderson Myrdene (eds.), Berlin, Springer, pp. 109-122. 

BARRENA, Sara. 2001. “Los hábitos y el crecimiento: una perspectiva peirceana”, Razón y palabra 21, México, Febrero-Abril.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2016. Inferences from Signs. Peirce and the Recovery of the σημεῖον. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 52(2), 259­–284.

BELLUCCI, Francesco. 2021. “Peirce on Symbols,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 103:1, 169–188.

BERGMAN, Mats. 2000. Meaning and Mediation. Toward a Communicative Interpretation of Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Helsinki: Universidad de Helsinki.

BERGMAN, Mats. 2004. Fields of Signification: Explorations in Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Vantaa: Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki / Dark.

BERGMAN, Mats. 2009. Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication: the Rhetorical Underpinnings of the Theory of Signs. Londres: Continuum.

BERGMAN, Mats. 2009. “Experience, Purpose, and the Value of Vagueness: On C. S. Peirce’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Communication.” Communication Theory 19, 248–277.

BEUCHOT, Mauricio. 1991. “La filosofía escolástica en los orígenes de la semiótica de Peirce,” Analogía 5 (2), 155-66.

BORGES, Priscila C. 2014. Experience And Cognition In Peirce’s Semiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 30(1-2), 1-26. 

BORGES, Priscila C. 2015. A system of 21 classes of signs as an instrument of inquiry. The American Journal of Semiotics, 31(3-4), 245-276.

BUCZYNSKA-GAREWICZ, Hanna. 1985. “Peirce’s semiotics and Heidegger’s hermeneutics.” Semiotics 1985: 467–478.

BURKS, A. W. 1949. “Icon, Index, Symbol.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9:673–89.

CARAVÀ, Marta 2019. “The Threshold of Representations. Integrating Semiotics and the Cognitive Sciences,” VS, 48, 157-173.

CHAMPAGNE, Marc. 2018. Consciousness and the Philosophy of Signs: How Peircean Semiotics combines Phenomenal Qualia and Practical Effects. New York: Springer.

CHIASSON, Phyllis. 2001. Peirce’s Pragmatism: the Design for Thinking. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

CLARK, David S. 1990. Sources of Semiotic: Readings with Commentary from Antiquity to the Present. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 1989. Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. 2003. “The Space of Signs: C.S. Peirce’s Critique of Psychologism.” In Jacquette, D. (ed.), Philosophy, Psychology, and Psychologism: Critical and Historical Readings on the Psychological Turn in Philosophy. Dordrecht; London: Kluwer Academic.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent 2020. An “historicist” reading of peirce’s pragmatist semeiotic: A pivotal maxim and evolving practices. Charles S.Peirce Society.Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society, 56(3), 374-399.

DEGANI-RAZ, Irit. 2021. “Spatial Diagrams and Geometrical Reasoning in the Theater,” Semiotica, 239, 177–200.

DELLEDALLE, Gérard. 1979. Théorie et pratique du signe, Payot.

DELEDALLE, Gérard. 2000. Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

DENUNZIO, F. 2002. “Deleuze, Peirce e le mille rifrazioni cinematografiche del simbolo.” In A. Cicalese e A. Landi (a cura di), Simboli, linguaggi e contesti. Roma: Carocci.

DUMAIS, Fabien. 2010. L’appropriation d’un objet culturel: une réactualisation des théories de C.S. Peirce à propos de l’interprétation. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.       

ECO, Umberto. 1971. Le forme del contenuto. Milano: Bompiani.

ECO, Umberto. 1973. Il segno, Milano: Isedi.

ECO, Umberto &. SEBEOK, Thomas A. 1983. Il Segno Dei Tre: Holmes, Dupin, Peirce. Milano: Bompiani.

ECO, Umberto. 1997. Kant e l’ornitorinco. Milano: Bompiani.

ECO, Umberto. 2007. La soglia e l’infinito. Peirce e l’iconismo primario. In Studi di semiotica interpretativa, a cura di C. Paolucci, ristampato in Dall’albero al labirinto. Milano: Bompiani.

EHRAT, Johannes. 2005. Cinema and Semiotic: Peirce and Film Aesthetics, Narration and Representation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.           

FABBRI, Paolo. 1997. “Come Deleuze ci fa segno. Da Hjelmslev a Peirce,” in S. Vaccaro (a c. di), Il secolo deleuziano, Mimesis, Milano, 111-124

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1983. La polemica sull’iconismo (1964-1975), Napoli: ESI.

FABBRICHESI, Leo R. 1986. Sulle Tracce del Segno. Firenze: Nuova Italia Editrice.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella & MARIETTI, Susanna (eds.). 2006. Semiotics and Philosophy in Charles Sanders Peirce, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

FABBRICHESI, Rossella. 2019. From Gestures to Habits: A Link Between Semiotics and Pragmatism. The Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Peircean Semiotics, ed. by t. Jappy, Bloomsbury: London.

FISCH, Max H. 1986. Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism. K. L. Ketner y C. Kloesel eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

FITZGERALD, J. 1966. Peirce’s Theory of Signs as Foundation for Pragmatism. The Hague: Mouton.

FUMAGALLI, Armando. 1995. Il Reale nel Linguaggio. Indicalità e Realismo nella Semiotica di Peirce. Milano: Vita e Pensiero. 2 ed. 2000.

FUMAGALLI, Armando. 2004. Da Peirce a Benveniste: gli indicatori e la teoria dell’enunciazione. Torino: Ananke.

HERETH, Joachim, and REINHARD Pöschel. 2011. “Peircean Algebraic Logic and Peirce’s Reduction Thesis.” Semiotica 186:1/4, 141–167.

HILPINEN, Risto. 2015. “Conception, Sense, and Reference in Peircean Semiotics.” Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 192, (4): 991-1018.

HOUSER, Nathan. 2010. “Peirce, Phenomenology, and Semiotics”, The Routledge Companion to Semiotics, Paul Cobley, P., ed., City, Routledge.

IBRI, Ivo. 2020. Semiótica e Pragmatismo. Interfaces Teóricas. Vol. 1. São Paulo/Marília: FiloCzar.

LALOR, B. J. 1997. The Classification of Peirce’s Interpretants. Semiotica 114 (1–2):31–40.

LANE, Robert. 2009. “Persons, Signs, Animals: A Peircean Account of Personhood.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45:1, 1–26.

LANGSDORF, Lenore & SMITH, Andrew R. (eds.). 1995. Recovering Pragmatism’s Voice: The Classical Tradition, Rorty, and the Philosophy of Communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.

LISZKA, James Jacób. 1996. A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

MADDALENA, Giovanni. 2003. Istinto razionale: studi sulla semiotica dell’ultimo Peirce. Torino: Trauben.

MADDALENA, Giovanni e TUZET,. Giovanni (a cura di) 2004. Peirce: fenomeni, segni, realtà. Torino: Ananke.

NÖTH, Winfried. 2021. “Trajectory: A Model of the Sign and of Semiosis,” Sign System Studies, 48:2–4, 182–191.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio & LEONARDI, Paolo (a c. di). 2015. Filosofia del linguaggio, semiotica e filosofia della mente. A partire da c. S. Peirce nei cento anni dalla morteNumero speciale della Società Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2017. “Semiotics, Schemata, Diagrams and Graphs: a New Form of Diagrammatic Kantism by Peirce,” in: Peirce on Perception and Reasoning. From Icons to Logic, New York and London: Routledge, 117-133.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2018. “Logic of Relatives and Semiotics in Peirce. From the “Subject-Predicate” Inferential Structure to the Synechistic Topology of Interpretation, in: How To Make Our Signs Clear, Boston: Brill, 36 – 58.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio. 2020. Cognitive Semiotics. Integrating Signs, Minds, Meaning and Cognition, Berlin and New York: Springer.

PAOLUCCI, Claudio & BELLUCCI, Francesco (eds.), 2015. Peirceana Three. Peirce e l’iconismo / On Iconism, Versus 120.

PETRILLI, Susan. 2004. “From Pragmatic Philosophy to Behavioral Semiotics: Charles W. Morris After Charles S. Peirce.” Semiotica 148, 277-.

PETRILLI, Susan. 2009. Signifying and Understanding: Reading the Works of Victoria Welby and the Signific Movement. Berlin: De Gruyter.

PETRILLI, Susan. 2010. “Image and Primary Iconism: Peirce and Husserl.” Semiotica 181, 263-.

PETRILLI, Susan. 2015. “Sign, Meaning, and Understanding in Victoria Welby and Charles S. Peirce.”Signs and Society (Chicago, Ill.), 3(1), 71-102.

PHARIES, David A. 1985. Charles S. Peirce and the Linguistic Sign. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. 2006.  Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication. Dordrecht, London: Springer.

PONGUTÀ PUERTO, César Fredy Noel. 2012. Anticipazioni della semiotica di Peirce nella logica aristotelica. Roma: Universtà Pontificia Salesiana.

PONZIO, Augusto. 1997. “Semiotics Between Peirce and Bachtin.” Russian Literature XLI, 333-352.

PONZIO, Augusto. 2005. “Dialogic Gradation in the Logic of Interpretation: Deduction, Induction, Abduction.” Semiotica 153, 155-173.

PONZIO, Augusto. 2015. “Peirce e Bachtin.” In M.A. BONFANTINI, R. FABBRICHESI, S. ZINGALE (a cura di), Su Peirce. Interpretazioni, ricerche, prospettive. Milano: Bompiani, 201-211.

PRONI, Giampaolo. 2017. La Semiotica Di Charles S. Peirce: Il Sistema e l’Evoluzione. Ariccia: Aracne.

QUEISNER, & T. VIOLA (Eds.), Das bildnerische Denken: Charles S. Peirce. Berlin: Akademie Verlag GmbH.

SANTAELLA, Lúcia. 2004. O papel da mudança de hábito no pragmatismo evolucionista de peirce.Cognitio: Revista De Filosofia, 5(1), 75-83.

SANTAELLA, Lúcia. 2007. “Sinequismo e onipresença da semiose.” Cognitio: Revista De Filosofia, 8(1), 141-149.

SANTAELLA, Lúcia. 2008. “Epistemologia semiótica.” Cognitio: Revista De Filosofia, 9(1), 93-110.

SANTAELLA, Lúcia. 2009. “2007 presidential address: Pervasive semiosis.”Transactions of the Charles S.Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 45(3), 261-272. 

SANTAELLA, Lúcia. 2016. “A supplement instead of a completion.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 8(1), 187-190.

SAVAN, David. 1987-88. An Introduction to C. S. Peirce’s Full System of Semiotic. Toronto: Monograph Series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle.          

SHORT, Thomas L. 1996. “Interpreting Peirce’s Interpretant,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 32 (4), 488-541.

SHORT, Thomas L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SHORT, Thomas L. 2013. “Questions Concerning Certain Claims Made for the New List,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 49 (3), 267-298.

SINI, Carlo. 1978. Semiotica ed ermeneutica nel pensiero contemporaneo, Dispensa, Milano: Cortina. [disponibile online].

STJERNFELT, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.

STJERNFELT, Frederik. 2014. Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston, MA: Docent Press.

SFENDONI-MENTZOU, Demetra. 1993. “The Role of Potentiality in C. S. Peirce’s Tychism and in Contemporary Discussions in Quantum Mechanics and Micro-Physics.” In E. Moore ed., Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science: Papers from the 1989 Harvard Conference. The University of Alabama Press, pp.246-261.

TIERCELIN, Claudine. 1993, La Pensée-Signe: Études sur Peirce, Nîmes, Jacqueline Chambon,

VIMERCATI, Fulvia. 2005. La scrittura del pensiero: semiotica e fenomenologia nei grafi esistenziali di C. S. Peirce. Milano: Albo versorio.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2011. “Philosophy and the Second Person: Peirce, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Benveniste, and Personal Pronouns as Universals of Communication,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 47/4, 389-420.

VIOLA, Tullio. 2012. “Peirce and Iconology: Habitus, Embodiment, and the Analogy between Philosophy and Architecture,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 4/1, 6-31.

Back to Table of Contents